<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 15 Jan 2017 09:19, "Paul Eggert" <<a href="mailto:eggert@cs.ucla.edu">eggert@cs.ucla.edu</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="quoted-text">Jon Skeet wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If the time in UTC is known, but the offset to local time is unknown,<br>
this can be represented with an offset of "-00:00". This differs<br>
semantically from an offset of "Z" or "+00:00", which imply that UTC<br>
is the preferred reference point for the specified time.<br>
</blockquote>
That's not what we intend to convey in this case, is it?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No, it's pretty much what we want to convey. In the case in question, the time in UTC is known, and local time is undefined which means it is unknown. An example is Antarctica/Troll before 2005, when Troll Station was uninhabited<br></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Fair enough - that makes sense. Will have to check whether this will need a change in Noda Time...</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Jon</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>