<div dir="ltr"><div>The northamerica file has this note in it:</div><div><br></div><div># From Paul Eggert (2007-08-17):<br></div><div># ...</div><div><div># Other than Indianapolis, the Indiana place names are so nondescript</div><div># that they would be ambiguous if we left them at the 'America' level.</div><div># So we reluctantly put them all in a subdirectory 'America/Indiana'.</div></div><div><br></div><div>I have gone through the mailing list archives from around this time, and also the 8/2005 timeframe (when the Indiana changes were starting to become clear), but I can't find any discussion about this, and Google is failing me.</div><div><br></div><div>Does anyone remember when the pros and cons of using three levels for names was discussed?</div><div><br></div><div>I just want to read up on some of that background.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks. </div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_signature">--Matthew Donadio (<a href="mailto:matt@mxd120.com" target="_blank">matt@mxd120.com</a>)<br></div></div>
</div>