<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Chris Woodbury via tz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tz@iana.org" target="_blank">tz@iana.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I note, in the event of a (highly unlikely) negative leap<br>
second, the LEAP directive generated is for 23:59:59 which,<br>
in the case of a negative leap second, doesn't exist. I<br>
reviewed the C code and, it seems to me, the transaction<br>
added should actually be for the second before, 23:59:58,<br>
as the transaction itself causes 23:59:59 to be skippedaltogether. (Kinda hard to skip an event if you're in it.)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The "Leap" line references the second that should be removed, so 23:59:59 (stationary) is correct.</div></div></div></div>