<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04.07.19 17:04, Michael H Deckers
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:5dcb6666-be64-2a87-abd2-4b7c95eb433c@googlemail.com">
<br>
On 2019-07-04 14:11, Alois Treindl sent newspaper excerpts:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">In the year 2013 I had contributed
information that Swiss neighbor country Liechtenstein,
represented by Europe/Vaduz in file backzone, did not have
daylight saving time in 1941 and 1942, while Switzerland,
represented by Europe/Zurich, did have it.
<br>
<br>
A colleague sent me a follow-up question today, which cause me
to reconsider the question.
<br>
<br>
I was able to access the online archive of the Vaduz paper
Vaterland for free - they offer a special summer deal.
<br>
<br>
I could confirm frm the paper that Liechtenstein did in fact
follow the same DST in 1941 and 1942 as Switzerland did.
<br>
<br>
The entry Europe/Vaduz in the file backzone can be removed, so
that the link Europe/Zurich Europe/Vaduz remains effective even
for those who, like me, compile TZ with backzone included.
<br>
<br>
I attach a few newspaper clippings, not translated.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thank you very much! Even with Europe/Vaduz dropped
<br>
from backzone, I think the (now established) fact
<br>
that Vaduz is like Zurich since at least 1894-06
<br>
is worth being recorded.
<br>
<br>
Could you please give the dates of the clips of Vaterland?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>3 May 1941</p>
<p>4 October 1941</p>
<p>6 May 1941</p>
<p>from <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.vaterland.li/archiv/epaperinhalt/">https://www.vaterland.li/archiv/epaperinhalt/</a><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>