[UA-discuss] Use Cases

[Ronald Geens]

Rubens,

  I fully agree that test processes should indeed be fully automated … in reality there are still a lot of cases, especially in front-end and website development I am afraid, where this is not the case.

Anyhow, it is not only the testing cost that will determine which usecases to support for a certain development. 
Splitting the usecases into two levels would already allow a working solution at minimal level without having "to bother" with IDN development and testing.
This is of course a very much ASCII-world driven viewpoint which is not necessarily in line with real Universal Acceptance but using the agile principle of “good enough” this still has value according to me.

Ron Geens
DNS Belgium

> On 30 Dec 2015, at 13:09, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Em 30 de dez de 2015, à(s) 09:28:000, Ronald Geens <ronald.geens at dnsbelgium.be> escreveu:
>> 
>> I haven’t seen any replies yet but as I think it is an important topic I would like to chime in.
>> 
>> In theory all of the cases mentioned below should be tested but as you indicated this is cost prohibitive.
> 
> I disagree that cost is linked to the number of test cases. Test processes today are usually automated, so lifecycle management is usually the main cost driver, no matter testing 10 or 20 use cases. 
> 
> 
> Rubens
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>