[UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and implications on TLD acceptance

[Maxim Alzoba]

Hi Jennifer, 

We might need to rise awareness in the community, that idea of filtering whole TLDs is quite contrary to the idea of open and united internet.

Sounds weird, but according to the report all customers should buy .mil domains (the safest ones) , which is impossible.
(Usually everybody looks into worst and best and pass the rest).

P.s: most probably their customers are not civilians, so such logic might make some sense for them

I tried to reach site of BlueCoat from one of my VPN servers
https://www.bluecoat.com/whos-secure/customers/major-defense-contractor

And, to my surprise
I had "ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED" in Chrome (no explanation at all, just refused connection)
 
The reason - one of GEO Locators think that 89.104.90.178 is somewhere in Iran, when in reality it is in Moscow, Russia ...
(but this issue is outside of the scope of UA group)

Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)

On Sep 16, 2015, at 23:31 , Jennifer Gore Standiford <JStandiford at web.com> wrote:

> Ram and UA Members,
>  
> Have we requested or received any of the underlying data that supports the stats outlined in the BlueCoat report? I wonder why the .zip extension was referenced as a ‘shady’  considering it hasn’t launched yet.  
>  
> Thanks,
> Jennifer
>  
> Jennifer Gore Standiford
> Policy Director
> Web.com
> 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West  |  Jacksonville, FL 32258
> Office: 904. 680-6919| Cell: 904. 401-4347
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ram Mohan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 1:43 PM
> To: UA-discuss at icann.org
> Subject: [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and implications on TLD acceptance
>  
> Folks,
> BlueCoat, a security vendor used by most of the Fortune 500, released a report on the Web’s shadiest TLDs on Sep 1, 2015. They recommend to their 15,000+ customers to block all listed TLDs (report attached). Most of these are new gTLDs.
>  
> There are implications for universal acceptance. This will result in some discussion at the upcoming UA Coordination Summit in Horsham tomorrow and Friday. The summit will have a conference bridge for anyone interesting in participating. Don Hollander will provide details.
>  
> -Ram
> Chair, UASG
>  
> o: +1.215.706.5700 x103; m: +1.215.431.0958; f: +1.215.706.5701
> Skype: gliderpilot30
>  
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> The Web’s Top 10 "TLDs with Shady Sites*"
> 
> Rank   Top-Level Domain Name     Percentage of Shady Sites
> 
>  #1        .zip                                          100.00%
> 
> #2        .review                                    100.00%         
> 
> #3        .country                                  99.97%
> 
> #4        .kim                                         99.74%           
> 
> #5        .cricket                                   99.57%           
> 
> #6        .science                                  99.35%           
> 
> #7        .work                                      98.20%
> 
> #8        .party                                      98.07%           
> 
> #9        .gq (Equatorial Guinea)        97.68%
> 
> #10      .link                                         96.98%
> 
>  
>  



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20150916/4baa8106/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4321 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20150916/4baa8106/image001.png>