[UA-discuss] Contacts at...

Thu Jun 23 10:31:17 UTC 2016

Thank you for the help, M3 and Mark! Hoping that this gets fixed soon.

Cheers,
Shweta

*[image: Description: Description: Radix.gif]* <http://radix.website>

*Shweta Asher*

Sr. Manager, Security, Compliance & Legal

T: +91 (22) 3079 7500 Extn: 8522

Skype: shwetasahjwani

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:42 AM, M3 Sweatt <msweatt at microsoft.com> wrote:

> As a follow up, I’ve connected MarkSv with some of our contacts at Twitter
> to raise the issue.
>
>
>
> *From:* Dusan Stojicevic [mailto:dusan at dukes.in.rs]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:57 PM
> *To:* 'Tan Tanaka, Dennis' <dtantanaka at verisign.com>; M3 Sweatt <
> msweatt at microsoft.com>; 'Shweta Asher' <shweta at radix.email>
> *Cc:* UA-discuss at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
>
>
>
> Dennis:
>
>
>
> Agree with You with one small add-on to the problem (blue color are
> links): [image: cid:image005.png at 01D1CBFD.F51EDCE0]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As far as I can see, on Twitter in edit mode, if you are trying without
> any recognizable part (www, http(s), xn--,...) there is no linkifaction
> even for old ASCII domain names. Similar algorythm is used on Facebook.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dusan
>
>
>
> *From:* ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org
> <ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Tan Tanaka, Dennis
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:22 PM
> *To:* M3 Sweatt <msweatt at microsoft.com>; Shweta Asher <shweta at radix.email>
> *Cc:* UA-discuss at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
>
>
>
> This is an interesting example:
>
>
>
> I think I replicated what Asher is reporting. See picture 1 (orange-ish
> background). Note how the “.store” examples are in plain black whereas the
> “.コム” examples are highlighted in orange which indicates that twitter is
> recognizing them as a potential link.
>
>
>
> When the tweet is published, the “.store” domain names remain as plain
> text (no linkification) but the three .コム strings were converted to links
> (in addition to the a-label to u-label transformation, which is nice)
>
>
>
> It seems that twitter is looking for more than a prefix (http or https) to
> signal that the following string is a domain name, but also looking for the
> TLD in its suffix list or in a third party one. According to UASG
> linkification guidelines they should only do the former. (Mark – keep me
> honest here)
>
>
>
> -Dennis
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image001.png at 01D1CBFC.043DA140]
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image002.png at 01D1CBFC.043DA140]
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *M3 Sweatt <msweatt at microsoft.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 2:03 PM
> *To: *Shweta Asher <shweta at radix.email>, "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <
> dtantanaka at verisign.com>
> *Cc: *"UA-discuss at icann.org" <UA-discuss at icann.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
>
>
>
> Thanks. In this case, the challenge is that URLs using the gTLDs below
> posted on the service are not shortened to a t.co link (Twitter’s
> link-shortening service).
>
>
>
> Is that correct?
>
>
>
> *From:* Shweta Asher [mailto:shweta at radix.email <shweta at radix.email>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:52 AM
> *To:* Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka at verisign.com>
> *Cc:* M3 Sweatt <msweatt at microsoft.com>; UA-discuss at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
>
>
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
>
>
> It doesn't linkify with any prefixs either. Tried www, http://, https://,
> and nic.store.
>
>
>
> Regarding other gTLDs, I randomly tried a few and identified these ones
> that don't linkify either: .gmbh, .stream, .insurance, .salon, .vip,
> .beauty, .cruise, .free, .deal, .tube, etc. Obviously there must be more.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shweta
>
>
>
> *[image: escription: Description: Radix.gif]*
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fradix.website&data=01%7c01%7cmsweatt%40microsoft.com%7cae49c0bc9f67475a353508d399fccfc1%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=90h3x%2bXgy5w0s4tTtfyiMmFDfUZrPfDyHV%2bt1yqjnko%3d>
>
> *Shweta Asher*
>
> Sr. Manager, Security, Compliance & Legal
>
> T: +91 (22) 3079 7500 Extn: 8522
>
> Skype: shwetasahjwani
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Tan Tanaka, Dennis <
> dtantanaka at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> I meant to write h t t p and  h t t p s. Looks like my email client
> changed the strings.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka at verisign.com>
> wrote:
>
> Just so I understand.
>
>
>
> .store domain names are not linkified when the string is written as
> "domain.store"? What about if you add the prefix "awb://" or "awbs://"?
>
>
>
> Dennis
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:03 PM, M3 Sweatt via UA-discuss <
> ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks, this is helpful. Are there other gTLDs that run into issues?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Shweta Asher <shweta at radix.email>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 21, 2016 9:58 AM
> *To: *M3 Sweatt <msweatt at microsoft.com>
> *Cc: *UA-discuss at icann.org
> *Subject: *Re: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> My issue is specific to one of our new gTLDs - .store. Domains ending in
> many new TLDs are automatically linkified when you tweet (I've tried this
> using twitter on my desktop browser), but domains ending in .store (among
> others) aren't. I was hoping to bring this issue to their attention.
>
>
>
> Any guidance you can provide to get in touch with the right folks would be
> much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shweta
>
> *<image001.png>*
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fradix.website&data=01%7c01%7cmsweatt%40microsoft.com%7c7e600843c48649727ed808d399f53c47%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=XCiPr6%2bHWc%2fp0g2t5eDQj9T55JRprLPn5ODsWJgJTkw%3d>
>
> *Shweta Asher*
>
> Sr. Manager, Security, Compliance & Legal
>
> T: +91 (22) 3079 7500 Extn: 8522
>
> Skype: shwetasahjwani
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:09 PM, M3 Sweatt <msweatt at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> For which products or apps do you need support new gTLDs on? Is there
> general guidance needed or specific issues?
>
>
>
> We have contacts at Twitter and other companies, and can help you connect
> with the appropriate contacts. It may be good to aggregate/ consolidate
> technical asks such that companies could provide broad guidance.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Shweta Asher <shweta at radix.email>
> *Sent: *Monday, June 20, 2016 3:31 AM
> *To: *UA-discuss at icann.org
> *Subject: *Re: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
>
>
>
> Hi Don, all,
>
>
>
> If anyone has a contact at Twitter, please do share the same. We need to
> speak with them about linkification of certain new TLDs in tweets.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shweta
>
>
>
> *<image001.png>*
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fradix.website&data=01%7c01%7cmsweatt%40microsoft.com%7cb96d31ae14ec495db95408d398f6130d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=AhhUB2PS13URvY3Lz1oUpDWA%2bswXe7a4BXY1x6uy4to%3d>
>
> *Shweta Asher*
>
> Sr. Manager, Security, Compliance & Legal
>
> T: +91 (22) 3079 7500 Extn: 8522
>
> Skype: shwetasahjwani
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Brent London <brentlondon at google.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Kurt, Don.
>
>
> My point of contact at Yahoo replied yesterday evening, so I will continue
> the thread there. If that hits a wall, I'll follow up here!
>
>
>
> With regards,
>
> Brent
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:16 AM, <kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Don:
>
>
>
> I wrote to my contact at Yahoo, who is in the legal department.
>
>
>
> After trading emails, she asked that we provide a "short summary of the
> [email] issue that I can forward" to the right parities at Yahoo. (This
> leads me to think she has already made contacts within Yahoo.)
>
>
>
> We could probably use a chapter of what Mark or Brent has already written.
> Can you select a paragraph or two that I can forward?
>
>
>
> I hope this is helpful,
>
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
> --------- Original Message ---------
>
> Subject: [UA-discuss] Contacts at...
> From: "Don Hollander" <don.hollander at icann.org>
> Date: 10/1/15 11:44 pm
> To: "UA-discuss at icann.org" <UA-discuss at icann.org>
>
> G’day all…
>
> I’m hoping that you can help.
>
> I'm currently looking for the following contacts:
>
> - Yahoo - Someone who is familiar with their e-mail platform and plans for
> EAI
> - Adobe - Someone within their Flash Development Team
> - Mozilla - Someone within their Firefox team who’s working on Flash
> implementations
> - Twitter - Someone who is familiar with how they handle Linkifications
>
> If you are such a person, or you personally know such a person - or even
> know someone who will know someone (3 degrees of separation) - can you
> please let me kn! ow off the list?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Don
>
> don.hollander at icann.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12715 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/image009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 46544 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/image008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 16016 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/image005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 48277 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/image007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28912 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20160623/a3e26880/image006.png>