[UA-discuss] Fw: Re: IDN Implementation Guidelines [RE: Re : And now about phishing...]

[Dusan Stojicevic]

Well not entirely true either. There are ccTLDs, to which ICANN can make
just recommendations.
But, our world have gTLDs, where ICANN can set the rules for the zones
bellow. :)
It's not just black or white. :)

Dusan 


-----Original Message-----
From: ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Yuriy Kargapolov
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 11:33 PM
To: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap at NLnetLabs.nl>; ua-discuss at icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Fw: Re: IDN Implementation Guidelines [RE: Re :
And now about phishing...]


Monday, April 24, 2017, 12:16:54 AM, you wrote:

>  Andrew Sullivan writes:

 >> And that, of course, is where they will stop.  ICANN is capable of  >>
making rules about the root zone, but it cannot set policies for the  >>
zones below -- that's up to the operators of those zones.

not simply  - ICANN is capable of making rules about the root zone - ICANN
is capable of making at last the unified rules on the root zone and in
absolutely ICANN cannot set policies for the zones below -- that's up to the
Administrators of Registries of those zones.
In paradigm split-off the roles of Administrator (setting and establishment
of policies) and Technical Operator (technical support and maintenance) of
the Registry

> And maybe the contractual arrangments they have with these operators?
Jaap, soory, what kinds of operators?

>         jaap

-- 

Yuri                        mailto:yvk at uanic.net



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus