[UA-discuss] Fw: Re: IDN Implementation Guidelines [RE: Re : And now about phishing...]
dusan at dukes.in.rs
Sun Apr 23 22:41:28 UTC 2017
Well not entirely true either. There are ccTLDs, to which ICANN can make
But, our world have gTLDs, where ICANN can set the rules for the zones
It's not just black or white. :)
From: ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Yuriy Kargapolov
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 11:33 PM
To: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap at NLnetLabs.nl>; ua-discuss at icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Fw: Re: IDN Implementation Guidelines [RE: Re :
And now about phishing...]
Monday, April 24, 2017, 12:16:54 AM, you wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan writes:
>> And that, of course, is where they will stop. ICANN is capable of >>
making rules about the root zone, but it cannot set policies for the >>
zones below -- that's up to the operators of those zones.
not simply - ICANN is capable of making rules about the root zone - ICANN
is capable of making at last the unified rules on the root zone and in
absolutely ICANN cannot set policies for the zones below -- that's up to the
Administrators of Registries of those zones.
In paradigm split-off the roles of Administrator (setting and establishment
of policies) and Technical Operator (technical support and maintenance) of
> And maybe the contractual arrangments they have with these operators?
Jaap, soory, what kinds of operators?
Yuri mailto:yvk at uanic.net
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the UA-discuss