[UA-discuss] SAC095 - SSAC Advisory on the Use of Emojiin Domain

Satish Babu sb at inapp.com
Tue May 30 01:07:07 UTC 2017


In case you haven't seen this response to the SSAC Advisory:

https://medium.com/@Emoji_Domains/ssac-response-d8d2ad6e800c (also
available at  I❤️ICANN.ws <http://I%E2%9D%A4%EF%B8%8FICANN.ws>).







satish


On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Stuart Stuple via UA-discuss <
ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:

> Thought I had. <grin>
>
> I continue to believe - despite the excellent clarity of opinions
> presented - that emoji should be considered approprIate for indentifiers. I
> don't see any of the points raised in the article as compelling.
>
> But I am completely willing to accept that is my ignorance.
>
> -Stuart
>
> The smaller keyboard and use of voice recognition may increase my
> incoherence. Apologies. Feel free to ask for clarification of my word
> choices.
>
> Get Outlook <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> for iOS
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:18 PM -0700, "Asmus Freytag" <
> asmusf at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/2017 9:12 AM, Stuart Stuple via UA-discuss wrote:
>>
>> I understand the perspective that emoji are more variable than text as the emotional impact of the variations of emoji.
>>
>> The "emo" in "emoji" has absolutely nothing to do with the word (or the
>> concept of) "emotion".
>>
>> This was rather cleanly summarized in the SSAC paper, which immediately
>> leads to the question of whether anyone in this discussion has read more
>> than the headline on that paper....
>>
>> A./
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20170530/5cb3d215/attachment.html>


More information about the UA-discuss mailing list