[UA-discuss] Pending Documents for Publication

[Jothan Frakes]

Michele, I agree and I think the concern with developer response is
appropriate, but we really have to be authentic with ourselves as to why
that is.  It is reciprocal to that with ICANN gives.

My experience with developers/developer communities, is that it is
necessary to engage appropriately in their world for results to happen.
While it is improving, we still don't have ICANN presence at developer
conferences like OSCON, WWDC, Etc from ICANN, or if we do, it is a 'meh'
participation, and thus a reciprocal and diminished relevance and ability
to inspire response and action to things ICANN publishes.

I noticed a lot of traction with Mozilla when I put in time with that
community and take the time to inspire, educate, and evangelize the added
value of action.  Otherwise, there are a number of things like security
patches and keeping up with critical standards or other resource spends
take priority.

As the comms and resourcing improves, I hope also that the participation of
ICANN in developer events increases, which will have higher potential for
impact.

-Jothan




Jothan Frakes
Tel: +1.206-355-0230


On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <
michele at blacknight.com> wrote:

> Don et al
>
>
>
> Some really interesting data in these docs.
>
>
>
> The lack of engagement / response from developers with respect to issues
> raised with them is concerning.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Michele
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
> https://www.blacknight.com/
>
> http://blacknight.blog/
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072 <+353%2059%20918%203072>
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 <+353%2059%20918%203090>
>
> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
>
> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>
>
> *From: *<ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Don Hollander <
> don.hollander at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday 31 August 2017 at 01:19
> *To: *"ua-discuss at icann.org" <ua-discuss at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[UA-discuss] Pending Documents for Publication
>
>
>
> Please find attached documents for final comments before we publish:
>
>
>
> 04a – A review of popular browsers for UA Readiness – Spoiler alert – most
> are OK, but few handle the open dot or IDNs as we expect them to.   Some
> browser developers may see this as a feature and not a bug.
>
>
>
> 04c – a look at the issues that have been raised through our UA Complaints
> process and their resolution.  Short answer, not too many raised and even
> fewer resolved by the website developer
>
>
>
> 04d – A look at Websites and how UA Ready they are.  Good news – 7%
> accepted all names and just 7% accepted none of our sample set.  Bad news,
> just 7% accepted all names.
>
>
>
> 04g – UASG Programming Language Evaluation Criteria
>
>
>
> 06a – Revised UASG010 – Quick Guide to Linkification
>
>
>
> 06b – Revised UASG014 – Quick Guide to EAI
>
>
>
> Don
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20170904/42b0d6c4/attachment.html>