[UA-discuss] UA and phishiness

Asmus Freytag asmusf at ix.netcom.com
Thu Apr 26 18:43:11 UTC 2018


On 4/26/2018 11:29 AM, Dirk Bhagat wrote:
> Personally I have always believed these two areas to be deeply 
> connected - and  many new TLDs like Club and others have pretty strong 
> anti-abuse standards.
> Asking system administrators to bake in acceptance for new TLDs but 
> then not being able to address the abuse issue - rings hollow for a 
> lot of admins.

^^That.

> I would certainly be in favour of expanding the mandate to include a 
> view on abuse etc.
>
>
> --
> Dirk Bhagat
>
> CoFounder, CTO
> .CLUB DOMAINS LLC.
> 100 SE 3rd Ave, Suite 1310
> Fort Lauderdale, Fl, 33394
> o: 954.530.2580 m: 416.839.4945
> Get.club <http://www.get.club>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Richard Merdinger 
> <rmerdinger at godaddy.com <mailto:rmerdinger at godaddy.com>> wrote:
>
>     Andrew,
>     I get the connection, but I think that this is adjacent to our
>     remit as opposed to part of it.
>
>     Other thoughts on this?
>
>     Richard Merdinger
>     VP, Domains
>     rmerdinger at godaddy.com <mailto:rmerdinger at godaddy.com>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
>     Sent: April 26, 2018 12:34 PM
>     To: ua-discuss at icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>
>     Subject: [UA-discuss] UA and phishiness
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I'm in a meeting about the web PKI and there's a discussion about
>     how poor
>     the anti-abuse stance is of some new TLDs. Does UASG have a view
>     about
>     this?  Should it?
>
>     A
>
>     --
>     Please excuse my clumbsy thums
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20180426/cba7ec8e/attachment.html>


More information about the UA-discuss mailing list