[UA-discuss] UA and phishiness

Yuriy Kargapolov yvk at uanic.net
Mon Apr 30 17:51:32 UTC 2018


+1
exactly, the domain name, not the gTLD/ccTLD as is
we don't need another reincarnation of the similar SpamHouse approach

YK,
.укр IDN ccTLD

Monday, April 30, 2018, 8:28:15 PM, you wrote:

> folks should not block entire TLDs, only subdomains
> which is what happens in all legacy TLDs.  I doubt any admin is
> blocking ALL of .com, .biz, .uk etc
> my suggestion:

> make sure you accept any TLD by default, but feel free to blacklist
> any domain name that you consider harmful

>> On Apr 30, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Mark Svancarek via UA-discuss <ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> This seems reasonable, are there any objections?
>> 
>> we could advocate is: make sure you accept any TLD (and any domain name) by default, but feel free to blacklist those that you consider harmful
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Vittorio Bertola
>> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 01:21
>> To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>; Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>
>> Cc: Universal Acceptance <ua-discuss at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] UA and phishiness
>> 
>> > Il 26 aprile 2018 alle 22.27 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> ha scritto:
>> >
>> >
>> > I guess I was wondering whether the SG wants to say that b is fine but
>> > c is a bad idea. It sounds like the SG _does_ think that, but I can't
>> > find it on the site yet :-)
>> 
>> I think that system administrators should be aware that many more TLDs than the best known ones exist, including TLDs in non-ASCII characters, and even more will be introduced, and should support and accept all of them except if they think they have reasons to blacklist specific TLDs due to non-technical issues. So, what we could advocate is: make sure you accept any TLD (and any domain name) by default, but feel free to blacklist those that you consider harmful.
>> This would IMHO be an acceptable stance that does not enter into thorny content-related issues (because it does not tell anyone what to blacklist and when) but still promotes universal acceptance.
>> Regards,
>> --
>> 
>> Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com <mailto:vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com> Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy



More information about the UA-discuss mailing list