[UA-discuss] Emoji domain names redux

[Mark Svancarek]

Yep, you would need LGRs, rules about colors, accessibility technologies, etc.  Many cans of worms.

From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Maxim Alzoba
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 12:50 AM
To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka at verisign.com>
Cc: ua-discuss at icann.org; edmon at registry.asia
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Emoji domain names redux

To say more,

We might see something similar to LGRs for emojis,
due some of those not distinguishable by colour blinded people.

For example this portal filters our colours according to types of issues
https://www.toptal.com/designers/colorfilter<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.toptal.com%2Fdesigners%2Fcolorfilter&data=04%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7Cf460659ee33f4caec7fb08d5801a89fc%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636555773847576591%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-1&sdata=rKqlWI2%2Faz1NbT640o0p4VzSAVPXUi%2Bm54NXaFS7BhQ%3D&reserved=0>

and if you check something with full list of 11.0 emojis ...
some of them looks quite similar (as example http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-16/a-partial-list-of-emoji-coming-to-unicode-11.0-in-2018/9454016<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.net.au%2Fnews%2F2018-02-16%2Fa-partial-list-of-emoji-coming-to-unicode-11.0-in-2018%2F9454016&data=04%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7Cf460659ee33f4caec7fb08d5801a89fc%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636555773847576591%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-1&sdata=%2Fxilzt%2B3TtZdoAyoy1ojE1%2FpSHsp2444SPeq15KnoEQ%3D&reserved=0> )

P.s: it is another can of worms



Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp)
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)


On 2 Mar 2018, at 04:29, Tan Tanaka, Dennis via UA-discuss <ua-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>> wrote:

+1
Dennis

On Mar 1, 2018, at 6:14 PM, Edmon <edmon at registry.asia<mailto:edmon at registry.asia>> wrote:
As a slight nuance (but I think important), I think what we agreed to is that emojis are not part of the current standard for IDN/DNS. As such it is out of scope for UASG.

I do not think we support/not-support the development of emoji domains… but the right place to start that discussion may be IETF (not UASG), since the technical protocols need to be updated first for it to become a standard before we can talk about UA readiness for it.

Edmon



From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mark Svancarek via UA-discuss
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 5:37 AM
To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com<mailto:roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>>
Cc: ua-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Emoji domain names redux

Yep.
For the record, UASG does not support the use of emojis in domain names.  I think we explicitly declared that during the Seattle meeting in April 2017.

From: Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com<mailto:roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 11:01 AM
To: Mark Svancarek <marksv at microsoft.com<mailto:marksv at microsoft.com>>
Cc: ua-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Emoji domain names redux

…as if we did not have enough troubles with the serious stuff…


On 01.03.2018, at 17:46, Mark Svancarek via UA-discuss <ua-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>> wrote:

https://gizmodo.com/emoji-domains-are-the-future-maybe-1823319626<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Femoji-domains-are-the-future-maybe-1823319626&data=04%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7Ced2a181d6e734078b06508d57fa6cd66%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636555276751685116%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-1&sdata=Z85DZ%2F4p6gNkeotNhimkKdajYFoGGRHPCEw12ym70sE%3D&reserved=0>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20180302/51334d0b/attachment.html>