[UA-discuss] Issue needs discussion and closure
Tan Tanaka, Dennis
dtantanaka at verisign.com
Sun Mar 11 16:49:22 UTC 2018
> On Mar 11, 2018, at 9:00 AM, Mark Svancarek via UA-discuss <ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:
> We should recognize that the local part rules are very permissive and therefore this should be an ALLOWED case per the spec. But I vote that UASG declare it as a NOT RECOMMENDED case EXCEPT for script combinations which are already allowed to be mixed in the root zone.
I would stop at the first part and add that each mail admin set its own rules as far as mailbox names. The second part is troublesome as it mixes mailbox names with the (dns) root zone. I don’t see the need for a connection. Am I missing something?
More information about the UA-discuss