[UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents

Don Hollander don.hollander at icann.org
Fri Jan 25 05:45:14 UTC 2019


Thanks.

How’s this?


  *   Document Number (e.g. UASG000) – this will be maintained as a consistent reference name for a document.  NB: No hyphen in the document number.
  *   Document Short Title (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material) – this will be included in the file name.
  *   Document Language (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material EN) – this will be included in the file name.
  *   Document Revision – (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material  EN  2019-01-25) This will be based on the publication date and represented in the file name as yyyy-mm-dd.  It will also be included within the document.
  *   Document Link – (e.g. https://uasg.tech/documents/UASG000-Inventory-of-Material EN 2019 01 25.pdf<https://uasg.tech/documents/UASG-000-Inventory-of-Material%20EN%202019%2001%2025.pdf> ) This will be based on the language of the document and is what’s published on the UASG.Tech website and will retrieve the latest official version of the document.
  *   Archives: The UASG.tech website will include a repository of deprecated versions of documents that will be stored and displayed based on its file name (which will include the published date)
  *   Revision Details: For most documents we will maintain a table at the end showing a summary of revisions.  Where a document is used a brochure, this will not be done.

Revision Notes:
2019-01-25

Added Document Naming and Storage Conventions

2018-12-25

Added expected review dates





From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Tex
Sent: Friday, 25 January 2019 1:23 PM
To: 'Asmus Freytag' <asmusf at ix.netcom.com>; ua-discuss at icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents

Thanks for the clarification Asmus. I agree with you, brochures shouldn’t have revision histories.

I had noticed the one place where Jim used the word “reservation” and thought your second sentence was independent from the first, and commenting on that-
“I have reservations about embedding text like "wp-content/uploads/" in the official document link”

So it’s all good.
Tex


From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 4:10 PM
To: ua-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents

On 1/24/2019 2:55 PM, Tex wrote:
PS: Brochures, by their nature are different from the kind of reports and formal documents that need careful version tracking in the document. I disagree with Jim on his reservation.

This was about whether revisions are documented inside the document. Don, suggested not, and I would agree. I think of brochures as a type of document, not a technology, but may have misunderstood something.

A./
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190125/a5877e9a/attachment.html>


More information about the UA-discuss mailing list