[UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents

[Dr Ajaay Data]

It looks good to me. Offcourse 2019-01-25 is more clear than 20190125 , but just in case if we wish to get away with - . Thanks. 
 



Dr. Ajaay DATA  | Founder &amp CEO 

Get email id like अजय@डाटा.भारत in your own language,visit www.xgenplus.com 

 

From: Don Hollander   MailId : [88254506]To: Tex ,Asmus Freytag ,"ua-discuss at icann.org" Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG DocumentsDate: 25 Jan 2019 11:15:29 AM 






Thanks .
 
How&rsquos this?
 

Document Number (e.g. UASG000) &ndash this will be maintained as a consistent reference name for a document.  NB: No hyphen in the document number .
Document Short Title (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material) &ndash this will be included in the file name .
Document Language (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material EN) &ndash this will be included in the file name .
Document Revision &ndash (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material  EN  2019-01-25) This will be based on the publication date and represented in the file name as yyyy-mm-dd.  It will also be included within the document .
Document Link &ndash (e.g. https://uasg.tech/documents/UASG000-Inventory-of-Material EN 2019 01 25.pdf ) This will be based on the language of the document and is what&rsquos published on the UASG.Tech website and will retrieve the latest official version of the document. 
Archives: The UASG.tech website will include a repository of deprecated versions of documents that will be stored and displayed based on its file name (which will include the published date)
Revision Details: For most documents we will maintain a table at the end showing a summary of revisions.  Where a document is used a brochure, this will not be done .

Revision Notes:




2019-01-25


Added Document Naming and Storage Conventions




2018-12-25


Added expected review dates




 
 
 
 


From: UA-discuss  On Behalf Of Tex Sent: Friday, 25 January 2019 1:23 PM To: `Asmus Freytag`  ua-discuss at icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents


 
Thanks for the clarification Asmus. I agree with you, brochures shouldn&rsquot have revision histories .
 
I had noticed the one place where Jim used the word &ldquoreservation&rdquo and thought your second sentence was independent from the first, and commenting on that-
&ldquoI have reservations about embedding text like "wp-content/uploads/" in the official document link&rdquo
 
So it&rsquos all good .
Tex
 
 


From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 4:10 PM To: ua-discuss at icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents


 

On 1/24/2019 2:55 PM, Tex wrote:


PS: Brochures, by their nature are different from the kind of reports and formal documents that need careful version tracking in the document. I disagree with Jim on his reservation .

This was about whether revisions are documented inside the document. Don, suggested not, and I would agree. I think of brochures as a type of document, not a technology, but may have misunderstood something .
A./

Do not Remove:[HID]20190125111529919[-HID]
[XGENFOOTER]

[-XGENFOOTER]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190125/8f613da6/attachment.html>