[UA-discuss] Some Recommendations in Working Groups

[Sylvia Mantri]

++1

I appreciate the cooperative spirit and the attention to detail that will
enabled to streamline the entire process in order to achieve success and to
meet our goals. I second every word you said.

I couldn't be more thrilled to work with such a terrific group of people!

With many thanks,

Sylvia

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:37 PM richard nims <richnims at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello, everyone.
>
>
> Bessie, we all have volunteered to contribute in few working groups, I
> extant some recommendations in my individual capacity. In today’s
> environment, standards play a critical role in effective working of any
> working groups. Thus responsibility for how a standard evolves begins in
> our working group as-well. I recommend we establish the necessary framework
> for a sound standardization process. For groups i have applied for i.e. EAI
> and Technology working group  I have below recommendations:
>
>
>
> *Fundamental Principles of Operation*
>
> For the development of standards, openness and due process are mandatory.
> Openness means that any person who has, or could be reasonably expected to
> have, a direct and material interest, and who meets the requirements of
> these procedures has a right to participate by:
>
>
>
> a) Attending working group meetings
>
> b) Becoming a member of the working group
>
> c) Expressing a position for chair of working group and its basis,
>
>
>
> Due process is based upon equity and fair play. The standards development
> process should strive to have both a balance of interests and not be
> dominated by any single interest category.
>
>
>
> *Election of Chair of working group: *The UASG administrative group must
> get elections done for every working group. The interested members of the
> working group must file self-nomination or any member of working group
> should nominate, fundamentally that individual member nominated shall not
> be on any position in UA administrative group or any other working groups
> at the same time. Members of the working group should only be allowed to
> cast the vote and select chair of working group.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Working Group: *Working group member should be individual. Each member
> is expected to attend meetings. We must record attendance at meetings via
> teleconferencing and/or electronic means, e.g., Internet conferencing,
> shall count towards the attendance requirements apart from F2F meeting
> during ICANN or other events.
>
>
>
> *Responsibilities of Working Group: *
>
> Set goals and deadlines and adhere to them
>
> Prioritize work to best serve the group and its goals
>
> Get the materials available for community related to working of group
>
> Maintain lists of unresolved issues, action items, and assignments.
>
> The working group will engage in a fact-finding effort of the perceived
> problems raised in there space and what are the possible solutions, and
> what are the pros and cons relating these possible solutions. What
> activities are actually underway, how extensive are they. The Working Group
> can circulated surveys to gather facts about the technical and issues
> raised by services currently being provided in there space.
>
>
> Kind wishes
>
> Richard Nims
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190729/88b11b16/attachment.html>