[UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG011 Frequently Asked Questions

Sat Mar 2 13:28:37 UTC 2019

Dear Abdalmonem Brother,  its between 15.15 - 16.45 Monday Mar 11,2019Location:Topaz (ALAC)

Warm Regards
Nitin Walia | DirectorT: +91-141-2554970E: nitin at data.inL: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nitinwalia1977Get email id like नितिन@डाटा.भारत in your own language, download DATAMAIL app from your iOS or android play store. Visit: www.datainfosys.com    www.xgenplus.com    wwwdatamail.in    www.bharatsync.com    www.spamjadoo.com

From: Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila   MailId : [89235840]To: Roberto Gaetano Cc: Alan Greenberg ,Universal Acceptance ,Satish Babu Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG011 Frequently Asked QuestionsDate: 02 Mar 2019 06:54:44 PM  v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML)}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML)}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML)}
shape {behavior:url(#default#VML)}

Monday 11 March 2019, I do not know exactly at which time !! 

Thanks a lot.

All the Best, 
Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila
Deputy Manager, Dot Masr Registry,
Operation Sector.

National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority
   Office Tel.: +2 02 35341582 - +2 02 35341300
    Mobile:  +2 010 00049068 
   Fax       :  +2 02 35370537
  Website : http:\\www.mcit.gov.eg
                        : http:\\www.tra.gov.eg
   E-mail     : agalila at mcit.gov.eg
                        : atharwat at tra.gov.eg
  Skype      : abdalmonem.galila

DISCLAIMER
          This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or  entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify your system support manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the  National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA) .  Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The NTRA accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com]  Sent: 2 March, 2019 1:58 AM To: Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila  Cc: Mark Svancarek (CELA)  Universal Acceptance  Alan Greenberg  Satish Babu  Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG011 Frequently Asked Questions

Can you please give us details about where/when?

Thanks

r

On 01.03.2019, at 19:38, Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila agalila at mcit.gov.eg> wrote:

Not only this but also there is a UA statement by ME community with be discussed in the ME space.  

Sent from my iPhone

 On Mar 1, 2019, at 8:35 PM, Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:

+AlanG from ALAC

ALAC is holding a Universal Acceptance discussion on March 13.  I am not sure I will be able to attend, but I recommend that as many UASGers as possible participate.

From: UA-discuss ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Satish Babu Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 19:31 To: Dusan Stojicevic dusan at dukes.in.rs> Cc: Universal Acceptance ua-discuss at icann.org> Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG011 Frequently Asked Questions

Dear all

I find interesting that (a) UAI is targeted at the end-user, and consequently, the end-user is a stakeholder in UASG`s work (b) we have decided that we will not engage directly with end-users and (c) Despite deciding so, we `informally` reach out to end-users through some of our programs.

IMO, there is a bit of contradiction when these are taken together, and I respectfully suggest that the UASG clarifies its position vis-&agrave-vis end-users. Noting that UASG does not perhaps have the resources to directly reach out to end-users everywhere, a more pragmatic approach may be to engage with end-user organizations/communities including, but not limited to, ICANN At-Large.

With kind regards

satish

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:48 AM Dusan Stojicevic dusan at dukes.in.rs> wrote:

Dear all,

>From my opinion, Roberto is right. And, indeed, with this document, we are not addressing end users, and Lars is also right - UASG strategies doesn`t include end users. 

But, UASG targets end users, even if it`s not written in strategies. Firstly, ambassadors program - we heard in Barcelona about workshops that they have done. In audience, there was students, gov people and many more different kind of people. And some of them are end users. Let me try to emphasize that most of those groups (f.e. gov) is firstly user and then it can become promoter of UA.

Not only about this program, but we decided to make an effort to promote UA more on IGF events, global, regional and national. On this events we are addressing also to end users.

My logic on this is almost the same as Roberto`s: when you promote something labeled for years as "it doesn`t work" firstly you need to explain to everyone (all target groups) that "it works" on the level of end user. Then we can touch them further..

And we miss FAQ for users. That`s what I heard from people even connected to domain industry.

Regards,

Dusan

čet, 28. feb 2019. 20:40 Roberto Gaetano roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com> je napisao/la:

Hi Lars 

I think I fully understand why UASG&rsquos strategy does not include end users.

However, I do believe that in one way or the other end users are critical in this process, so there is some value in trying to engage them.

After all, UASG is not the only forum where these issues are discussed.

Cheers,

Roberto

On 27.02.2019, at 22:47, Lars Steffen lars.steffen at eco.de> wrote:

Hi Roberto,

If I imagine average end users, I think of people outside the domain industry. I don&acutet know anybody outside the industry who is exited about domain names at all. I count ALAC to the industry and/or community around this industry. Let&acutes face the bitter truth: We lack a critical mass out there that &ldquojust needs to be mobilized to ask for this&rdquo.

And so yes, the outreach strategy of the UASG does not include end users. We target developers, system architect, CIOs and C* Suite influencers. We are explicitly NOT targeting consumers nor registrants.

All the best,

Lars

Von: UA-discuss ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> im Auftrag von Roberto Gaetano roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com> Datum: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2019 um 21:40 An: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" dtantanaka at verisign.com> Cc: Universal Acceptance ua-discuss at icann.org> Betreff: Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG011 Frequently Asked Questions

Hi Dennis. 

You raise an issue that has, IMHO, profound implications.

>From my point of view, the ultimate beneficiary of UA is the end user, who will be allowed to access the Internet using his/her own language and script, and the local content providers, who can ensure that local people can access what they produce.

However, I am under the impression that the voice of the users is not particularly significant in the UASG - maybe this is also by design, as end users can seldom be excited by technical discussions and there are significant technical issues that UASG has to address in priority. However, they should be the ones &ldquoasking for this&rdquo.

My point is that we need to get end users more involved, so that they can become more active and even more &ldquopushy&rdquo for UA. I am personally active in ALAC - although I have no official position there - and have some difficulties in getting the attention on these issues. I am wondering whether we can use the upcoming Kobe meeting to have more involvement from this relevant stakeholder group.

Cheers,

Roberto

On 26.02.2019, at 17:51, Tan Tanaka, Dennis via UA-discuss ua-discuss at icannorg> wrote:

Hi Don,

A few edits for your consideration.

One question that I get asked sometimes is &ldquowho is asking for this?&rdquo The FAQ lightly touches on &ldquothe expansion of the internet&rdquo, but perhaps this question should be incorporated in a next iteration. I believe this dove tails with Mark&rsquos valid point about languages of the web (and evolution throughout the years).

My two cents.

Dennis

From: UA-discuss ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Don Hollander don.hollander at icann.org> Date: Monday, February 25, 2019 at 6:59 PM To: "UA-discuss at icann.org" ua-discuss at icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG011 Frequently Asked Questions

We have this FAQ published at https://uasg.tech/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/UASG011-160823-en-faq-digital.pdf

I&rsquod very much welcome comments from the community about this &ndash whether you think it&rsquos fine as it is or whether things have progressed since we last updated this in 2016 or whether there are fresh questions that should be included.

If you need a deadline, let&rsquos aim for the 5th of March.

Don

Don Hollander

Secretary General &ndash UASG

Skype: Don_Hollander

Do not Remove:[HID]20190302185444242[-HID]
[XGENFOOTER]

[-XGENFOOTER]  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 29533 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 269 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1238 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 450 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 511 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32157 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 152 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190302/05eb4fde/image006.png>