[UA-discuss] ICANN64

Patrick Patrick Davison patrickdavisons at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 13:25:25 UTC 2019


Hello Mark

Virtuous to see your response, well I am no one to submit any suggestions
for ambassadors. UA ambassador’s appointment was sole decision of
administrative group and no one asked from community members who should be
considered.  There was just one email to us about selected ambassadors who
were appointed for one year.

I strappingly have faith that candidates willing for the position must have
applied in last one year and UASG secretariat must be having the details of
them which they can share with administrative group.  Once you all have the
information your administrative group can set some selection standards and
ask secretariat to filter out the new candidates from it. As a community
members and believer is UASG mission I would only suggest that candidates
who can really contribute in the mission must be given chance.

Since the terms of earlier appointed UA Ambassadors is already over even
before ICANN64 and we still have names on website of old ambassadors whose
terms has already expired and who at present do not hold that position. So
pronouncement for new UA ambassadors should not be deferred.

Cheers!!!!

Patrick

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:23 PM Mark Svancarek (CELA) <marksv at microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Feel free to submit your suggestions for ambassadors.  No need to wait.
>
>
>
> *From:* UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Patrick
> Patrick Davison
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2019 12:26
> *To:* ua-discuss at icann.org; don.hollander <don.hollander at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [UA-discuss] ICANN64
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> Last week I shared below piece of information with newly appointed
> Administrative Group but look like I am just overhear. So sharing again
> with all in community. Also beside all other points startlingly inspite
> knowing the fact that the terms of earlier appointed UA Ambassadors is
> already over even before ICANN64 still no pronouncement were been made for
> new UA ambassadors during ICANN64 or later. I am surprised don’t we have
> nominations or interest submitted by peoples around the world during last
> one year who can be considered.
>
> Cheers !!!!
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:23 AM Patrick Patrick Davison <
> patrickdavisons at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Prodigious meeting all again during ICANN and enthusiastic to see the
> focus of universal acceptance universally in all groups in Kobe and also in
> ICANN.
>
> Further down are my observations on UASG in ICANN64 which i giving you all
> as food for thoughts.
>
> ·        Universal acceptance group exertions are now building shape.
>
> ·        Ram with administrative group members have put a strong
> foundation and given strong beliefs for UASG among all already.
>
> ·        Community have lots of expectations from newly elected Chair and
> vice chairs.
>
> ·        Issues raised for Universal acceptance program during public
> forums were disastrous yet new administrative group must seriously address
> it.
>
> ·        It’s fortunate that term for earlier elected UA Ambassadors is
> already over few month back so they must be quickly dropped to preserve
> civic credence.
>
> ·        We already have few newly elected UA Ambassadors now in team to
> take over and if we have pending applications they must be given chance
> quickly.
>
> ·        As per UASG community update counties to be precise China, UAE,
> India and Russia should we key focus areas so we should have new faces as
> UA Ambassadors in this region who can deliver UASG mission.
>
> ·        Persons vetoed by community should be kept away from any
> auxiliary selections. Earlier we heard a lot for Mr. Modi as Indian Prime
> minister and now in ICANN for a UA Ambassadors, terrible and sad for UASG.
> We should not show any nepotism towards anyone.
>
> ·        UASG available documents must be reviewed and updated to help
> community members
>
> ·        Short training modules and crash courses material must be soon
> updated on UASG.tech so that same can be used by institutions to educate
> for Universal acceptance program.
>
> ·        UA ready certifications for applications and website must be
> quickly planned and implemented.
>
> ·        Community have lots of expectations from Universal acceptance
> group so we should move with a structured plan to deliver speedily.
>
>
>
> Cheers !!!!
>
>
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190325/69b14687/attachment.html>


More information about the UA-discuss mailing list