[UA-discuss] [Ext] Re: Document Review: UASG006 - Relevant RFCs

[Asmus Freytag]

On 5/8/2019 3:23 PM, Nabil Benamar wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> The title could be "Relevant RFCs and Unicode reports to Universal 
> Acceptance"
>
> And a separate table for Unicode reports within the same document.

The Unicode "technical reports" series includes both reports and 
standards. The ones related to securities should all be "Unicode 
Technical Standards" or "UTS", as in UTS#36, if not annexes to the main 
Unicode standard (or "UAX", as in UAX15). None of them are "UTR" which 
would be the designator for "technical reports".

Just like RFCs are not longer really "request for comments", as may have 
been the case originally.

Now, the SSAC statement, as well as the W3C documents on text layout 
requirements fit neither of the categories.

"Standards and other documents related to Universal Acceptance"

would cover it.

A./


>
>
> Best regards
> Nabil Benamar
> -------------------
> نبيل بنعمرو
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:16 PM Don Hollander <don.hollander at icann.org 
> <mailto:don.hollander at icann.org>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Nabil.
>
>     Good point with regard to the title.  Any suggestions?
>
>     And with regard to the table – within the same document, yes?  
>     Not another document?
>
>     D
>
>     *From:*Nabil Benamar <benamar73 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:benamar73 at gmail.com>>
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, 8 May 2019 11:09 PM
>     *To:* Don Hollander <don.hollander at icann.org
>     <mailto:don.hollander at icann.org>>
>     *Cc:* ua-discuss at icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org>
>     *Subject:* [Ext] Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG006 -
>     Relevant RFCs
>
>     Hi Don, All
>
>     I think it would be better to decouple the unicode reports from
>     the RFCs since the title focus on "Relevant RFCs...". You can make
>     a seperate table or adjust the title of the document.
>
>     Best regards
>
>     Nabil Benamar
>
>     -------------------
>
>     نبيل بنعمرو
>
>     On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:20 AM Don Hollander
>     <don.hollander at icann.org <mailto:don.hollander at icann.org>> wrote:
>
>         Here’s a link to a proposed revision of UASG006.
>         https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grJBCjX89ELF978tKA [1drv.ms]
>         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__1drv.ms_w_s-21Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grJBCjX89ELF978tKA&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=YI0XKyKCabKQi3GVWLvuoyCWjH9WBgEBxLbMnmhSRwo&m=_LSnDFQp07LhSfjfFQutxJMXhQuNu6eTyVR60ltQdgk&s=sDl3cUvoQfqTjwPtD-jVCIERbCvmTcgPlosCfBL3Obk&e=>
>
>
>         We’ve added a few references to Unicode standards and some W3C
>         documents.
>
>         Your comments are welcome by the 13^th of May.
>
>         Don
>
>         Don Hollander
>
>         Secretary General – UASG
>
>         Skype: Don_Hollander
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190508/b3300ff1/attachment.html>