<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="ProgId" content="PowerPoint.Slide">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft PowerPoint 14">
</head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div style="font-size: 22px;">On 4/15/15, 13:21, "Jothan Frakes" <<a href="mailto:jothan@jothan.com">jothan@jothan.com</a>> wrote:</div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-size: 22px;"><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Developers are going to need an entirely different resource and dialog...</div></div></div></div></blockquote></span><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><div style="font-size: 22px;">Good and relevant feedback follows - yes, we have to consider the audience.</div><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><div style="font-size: 22px;">Saying that while myself not intending to attend OScon.</div><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-size: 22px;"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div dir="ltr"><div>The message to the developer community would be more one of awareness of nTLDs, resources like the IANA PSL (or even the Mozilla one), and "here's how you can best interact with a User Interface and not present errors for valid domains", TLD handling,
IDNA, and other things that they'll care about.</div></div></blockquote></span><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><div style="font-size: 22px;">You're right that my slides played (pandered) to the NANOG and specifically the DNS sub-culture and is tuned to knowing what I'd be saying on stage. But I'll point out that it seems like the links to the resources later in the slide deck would be a key ingredient in presenting to the developer community, i.e., the "CSV" of the class-of-2012 TLDs.</div><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><div style="font-size: 22px;">E.g., I think slide 12 (not sure if I'm referring to my as-used deck or a draft):</div><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><div>
<!--StartFragment-->
<div style="margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0.31in; text-indent: -0.31in; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed; word-break: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><i><span style="font-family: Wingdings;">ยค </span><span style="font-family: 'Source Sans Pro'; color: rgb(12, 31, 36);">Want to know what TLD is coming?</span></i></span></div>
<p style="margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0.5in; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed; word-break: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><i><span style="font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(10, 31, 36);">https://</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(10, 31, 36);">newgtlds.icann.org</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(10, 31, 36);">/</span><span style="font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(10, 31, 36);">newgtlds.csv</span></i></span></p>
<!--EndFragment--></div><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><div style="font-size: 22px;">Looking at the other URLs, they are focused on what operators would need to use in NOC operations. Perhaps there is not a lot of reusable portions - other than the idea that developers need to get some "plain facts" about the roll out (the chart showing the years) so they know this is an on-going process, etc. Beyond that, the needs of developers and code distributors/software engineers differs from the operators. (If you've ever come across "devops" you'd find that unsurprising.)</div><div style="font-size: 22px;"><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-size: 22px;"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div dir="ltr"><div>The presentation gained the benefit of your narrative, and it was designed to support the narrative rather than be a stand alone document, so someone reading that deck without the benefit of your dialog may get lost in a sea of insider acronyms or terminology.
I would defer to others at ICANN on the choice to use it, though it certainly could not hurt to have more. I'd have it be a video with your narrative running through the deck to make things more clear if I ran the world.</div></div></blockquote></span><div><br></div><div>Good suggestion. Especially here when I had to cut the deck down to fit the time allotted, so it isn't stand-alone capable.</div><div><br></div></body></html>