<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top"><div>Jeremy, Thank you for your reply:<br /><br />I would also like to add that regardless of whether or not Apple employees, of a private company, are ever forced to perform any action for a government agent, they are already victims of attempted enslavement by the U.S. government. The reason why Josh Earnest stated publicly that the White House is not demanding that Apple build anything new for the government, is because Josh Earnest knows that any such demand if it occurred was a criminal act, and Josh Earnest wants to distance himself and the President from that attempted enslavement of Apple's employees which in fact already occurred by the time Josh Earnest spoke.<br /><br />Beginning with the Emancipation Proclamation, Enslavement of American citizens has been unconstitutional for well over a century in the United States, and anyone who has participated in the attempted
enslavement of Apple employees in this instance is a criminal-at-large at this time, in my opinion which I believe is consistent with the U.S. Codes as I understand them, as enslavement is unlawful as stated in the U.S. Codes. I ask the internet community to speak out against the attempted enslavement of Apple's employees by the criminal participants in that attempted crime, and for the relevant law enforecement entities to arrest all those who have participated in the attempted enslavement of Apple's employees. Barack Obama, as a direct participant in the attempted enslavement of Apples Employees, should be impeached by the U.S. Congress immediately for his administrations support of that unlawful action of attempted enslavement. <br /><br />Any DOJ employee who has already acted as a participant in the attempted enslavement of Apple employees who are American citizens should be charged with treason and deported. As members of the law enforcement
community who know or should know the laws against enslavement in the United States, those participants therefore willfully and knowingly committed the crime of attempted enslavement, and are in the process of committing that crime until such demand is withdrawn. <br /><br />Even if the participating DOJ and FBI do withdraw their demand to enslave Apple employees, that should not absolve those who have already participated as criminals committing the crime of attempted enslavement from being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, so as to set an example to all Americans that the human rights crimes of slavery and attempted slavery will not again be tolerated in the United States. Anything less than prosecutions and deportations of all the DOJ/FBI participants for their attempted enslavement of Apple's employees will allow, at the very least, for the future opportunity of a reversal of the humane and civilized precedent against slavery
established by Abraham Lincoln.<br /><br />Ron</div></td></tr></table> <div id="_origMsg_">
<div>
<br />
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
</b>
Ron Baione via UA-discuss <ua-discuss@icann.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
</b>
<UA-discuss@icann.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
</b>
[UA-discuss] The United States' Effective Nationalization of Apple's Employees <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
</b>
Thu, Feb 18, 2016 3:18:58 AM <br>
</div>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" valign="top"><div>This email is written in support of the rights of employees of the american tech industry:<br clear="none"><br clear="none">After forcing all American citizens to purchase a product, health insurance, the U.S. government is looking to force employees of a private company, Apple, to perform a specific task in the creation of a new product, in this instance, to create new code which would then allow the government to bypass Iphone security protections, according to the article at the following website:<br clear="none"><br clear="none">http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/17/apple-unlocked-iphones-for-the-feds-70-times-before.html<br clear="none"><br clear="none">The U.S. government can legally ask companies to comply with existing regulations, but a government agent forcing individual
employees of a private company to perform a specific task, effectively forcing the employee to choose between retaining their job and creating the new
product for the government, is simply the next step down the slippery slope. Americans are in the "forced actions phase" of this oligarchy. <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Internet policy groups and all internet governance groups should at least consider that when the heath insurance mandate was accepted, people wondered what would be the next mandate, would a future president take advantage of the trend towards mandating citizens to act? If apple's employees are forced to comply with a forced action, that in my opinion is no different than Apple having been nationalized by the U.S. government, in my opinion. What's next? The argument is much bigger than phones. U.S. government agents could order any private company employee in the entire country to perform any task the government deemed necessary. If a future government agent deemed that it was immediately necessary for a future apple employee to shine the shoes of the
government agent, then they could refer back
to the forced creation of code and ask, what's the difference? <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Oligarchy is about gaining the obedience of its citizens to the state via brutality (see broken windows police theory argument on gaining obedience) and via the provision of lose-lose choices that pit a citizen against his or her own ability to economically support himself or herself. Any male government agent forcing or pressuring a female private employee at apple to perform a specific action would also be violating women's Civil Rights law, same can be said for race etc., civil rights law exist for a reason in the american workplace. Oligarchy is government by hypocritical political criminals and their stooges, and internet governance groups should call it out for what it is and speak out against the american oligarchy on behalf of the U.S. tech industry which employs citizens from all countries. <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Ron<br
clear="none"></div></td></tr></table> <div class="yqt1633542500" id="yqt64562"><div id="_origMsg_">
<div>
<br clear="none">
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em;">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span>
</b>
Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>; <br clear="none">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span>
</b>
UA-discuss@icann.org <UA-discuss@icann.org>; <br clear="none">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span>
</b>
[UA-discuss] Review of UASG Charter <br clear="none">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span>
</b>
Tue, Feb 16, 2016 3:43:21 AM <br clear="none">
</div>
<br clear="none">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" valign="top">Further to the face-to-face meeting of the UASG Coordination group in January, the charter has been reviewed some fundamental changes are proposed.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Instead of having a community of volunteers supported by a professional body, we’re proposing shifting to a professional body supported by volunteers. The UASG Coordination group will shift more toward governance than operation, though volunteers are still very highly encouraged.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Please find attached a red-lined revision to the Charter.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Your comments would be welcome through the 22nd of February.<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">Don<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></td></tr></tbody></table>
</div>
</div>
</div></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>