<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Andre Schappo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:A.Schappo@lboro.ac.uk" target="_blank">A.Schappo@lboro.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
Some thoughts, having now caught up with all the UA emails on phishing.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>① Over the years there has been much discussion about Cyrillic being used to masquerade as ASCII domain names. I wonder if the Russian speaking community have been having similar discussions with respect to ASCII being used to masquerade as Cyrillic
domain names. </div>
<div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br>Quick comments here (mostly for a wider reading audience):<br><br>1] Need to include Greek in the Cyrillic/Latin (or "ASCII" as we call it here in this discussion) as being Homograph rich across all three from visually identical or near identicals</div><div><br>2] I used to believe that there was a bright line between all Cyrillic and all Latin/ASCII - and I learned through the process of many wise people like Yuri and Dusan spending time to evolve my thinking that these may be intermixed under perfectly normal use, and this also varies by region. We should not assume all of one or all of the other.</div><div><br><br></div></div><br></div></div>