<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>If only it were actually a response, instead of a post saying, "Neener, neener, emojis are cool, there's no problem. Well, maybe we need a whitelist or something."</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">A<br><br>-- <div>Andrew Sullivan </div><div>Please excuse my clumbsy thums. </div></div><div><br>On May 29, 2017, at 21:07, Satish Babu <<a href="mailto:sb@inapp.com">sb@inapp.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>In case you haven't seen this response to the SSAC Advisory:<br><br><a href="https://medium.com/@Emoji_Domains/ssac-response-d8d2ad6e800c" target="_blank">https://medium.com/@Emoji_<wbr>Domains/ssac-response-<wbr>d8d2ad6e800c</a> (also available at <a href="http://I%E2%9D%A4%EF%B8%8FICANN.ws" class="gmail-m_-6488363824862420687gmail-markup--anchor gmail-m_-6488363824862420687gmail-markup--p-anchor" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">I❤️ICANN.ws</a>).<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br></div>satish<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Stuart Stuple via UA-discuss <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org" target="_blank">ua-discuss@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div id="m_-7299173965880409386compose-container" style="direction:ltr">
<span><span content="Outlook Mobile for iOS"></span></span>
<div>
<div style="direction:ltr">Thought I had. <grin></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">I continue to believe - despite the excellent clarity of opinions presented - that emoji should be considered approprIate for indentifiers. I don't see any of the points raised in the article as compelling. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">But I am completely willing to accept that is my ignorance. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">-Stuart</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="m_-7299173965880409386acompli_signature">The smaller keyboard and use of voice recognition may increase my incoherence. Apologies. Feel free to ask for clarification of my word choices.
<br>
<br>
Get <a href="https://aka.ms/qtex0l" target="_blank">Outlook</a> for iOS</div>
</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:18 PM -0700, "Asmus Freytag" <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:asmusf@ix.netcom.com" target="_blank">asmusf@ix.netcom.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="3D"ltr"">
<div class="m_-7299173965880409386moz-cite-prefix">On 5/29/2017 9:12 AM, Stuart Stuple via UA-discuss wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>I understand the perspective that emoji are more variable than text as the emotional impact of the variations of emoji. </pre>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Candara">The "emo" in "emoji" has absolutely nothing to do with the word (or the concept of) "emotion".</font></p>
<p><font face="Candara">This was rather cleanly summarized in the SSAC paper, which immediately leads to the question of whether anyone in this discussion has read more than the headline on that paper....</font></p>
<p><font face="Candara">A./</font><br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>