[UA-EAI] EAI Evaluation Widget

[Paul Borokhov]

I’m unable to get any results for lensovetp at mail.ru. Just returns a page with nothing in the email field and no further options.

lensovetp at gmail.com works fine.

Paul

> 30 дек. 2017 г., в 19:41, Dr. Ajay DATA <ajay at data.in> написал(а):
> 
> XgenPlus gives Webmail, Pop, IMAP, SMTP, Antispam and anyone can get an IDN and get one EAI for testing at No cost.
> 
> Many of our friends are testing that way .
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On 31 December 2017 04:04:37 GMT+05:30, Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila <agalila at mcit.gov.eg> wrote:
> Don , Arnt suggests me IMAP software who is compatible with EAI and I will try to use it soon besides my postfix enable EAI server.
> 
> Let me ask a question , how could anyone evaluate the function of specific SW without having a similar model !!!
> That is why I am looking for a complete model  of fully EAI compatible mail system.
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Dec 30, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Don Hollander <don.hollander at icann.org> wrote:
> 
>> Abdalmonem:
>> 
>> For much of the past year we have been actively seeking someone to perform an evaluation of email software and services to determine how EAI ready they are.  We have still not received sufficient proposals to make an informed choice.   
>> 
>> In the meantime, I have not heard of any open source SMTP or POP3 servers.
>> 
>> Don
>> 
>> 
>>> On 30/12/2017, at 9:07 AM, Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila <agalila at mcit.gov.eg> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We need to say which pop3 or imap who is EAI ready to be used.
>>> I am already have EAI ready smtp server but do not have pop3 or imap server which EAI ready , may you have an idea about that so kindly share.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Dec 29, 2017, at 9:27 PM, John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Some people on this list appear to think that SMTP servers ought to consider punycode in the domain part as equivalent to utf8, though.
>>>> 
>>>> A-labels in domains should work since there's a 1:1 mapping between A-labels and U-labels and there's no question about what they mean.  In the local part, that doesn't work because local parts are neither A-labels nor U-labels.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
>>>> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jl.ly&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=YI0XKyKCabKQi3GVWLvuoyCWjH9WBgEBxLbMnmhSRwo&m=n9uFGOBVNQ1DtiBwW1DfWr8AenUQvqbK0OSqcjeUzQA&s=C71tuv3cWMLOKYse3n3CUNrm8gjXrIkl4kn0KQJicHY&e=
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> UA-EAI mailing list
>>>> UA-EAI at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UA-EAI mailing list
>>> UA-EAI at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai
>> 
>> Don Hollander
>> Universal Acceptance Steering Group
>> www.uasg.tech
>> don.hollander at icann.org
>> Skype: don_hollander
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> UA-EAI mailing list
> UA-EAI at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with XGenPlus.
> _______________________________________________
> UA-EAI mailing list
> UA-EAI at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai