[UA-EAI] Stackoverflow and ChatGPT

Asmus Freytag asmusf at ix.netcom.com
Thu Feb 2 01:05:08 UTC 2023


Marc,

you've identified two of the main problems with AI based answers. One, 
the impossibility to fix misperceptions embedded in the training data. 
The other, the difficulty for a human user to "rate" the level of 
expertise behind an AI generated answer. You can't use plausibility, 
because all AI generated answers are plausible. You can't use other 
"tells" of inexperience, because the AI generated texts don't have them. 
And you can't "rate" the AI like you can human experts; nor can you rate 
the true experts that it plagiarizes.

If, as can be expected, significant levels of AI generated output are 
then being published on various sites in ways that even an AI can't be 
sure it's AI generated, then you not only get garbage in, garbage out, 
but fully recycled garbage.

Misinformation of the human generated kind is harmless by comparison.

A./
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-eai/attachments/20230201/08c24261/attachment.html>


More information about the UA-EAI mailing list