[WP1] Agenda & Papers refs for WP1 Meeting #6 - 21.00-22.30 UTC on Wed 1 April

[Edward Morris]

Hi Jordan, 

In light of the memo from Adler Cohen, I'm not sure we even know all
of the options for the community powers mechanism let alone be in a position to chose one. Given the time needed for the law firm to get up to stead on our project there is a question in my mind as to whether even the revised time frame is doable. I don't take great joy in pointing this out but if asked to chose a model today I could not because 1. I'm not sure all possible models are on the table (the Adler Colvin memo suggested alternatives we really haven't fully considered) and 2. I'm still unsure of the specifics of some of the statutory models or at least would like confirmation from counsel as to what I believe the specifics are (and I'm one of the two volunteers who wrote our template on these models). Yet until we have a mechanism in place certain, many, aspects of our work inevitably will be stalled.

We perhaps should have consulted with the retained law firms before rebooting our schedule. We certainly need to do so specifically before we establish our new Wp1 work plan. Hopefully today's legal call will provide some answers that we can use in our wp1 call tonight.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 1, 2015, at 6:29 AM, Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> This email contains the agenda for the call and where to find relevant papers.
> 
> :: Agenda ::
> 
> I think we are likely to run out of time but the critical thing to get right is the Work Plan.
> 
> 
> 1. Agenda review.
> 
> 2. Work Plan for the next sprint.
> 
> 3. Community powers mechanism - do we have a preferred mechanism to propose to CCWG? (CCWG/Council, Members/Delegates, or internal SO/AC processes)
> 
> 4. Stress Test 18 paper (GAC advice and when the Board needs to try and reconcile with it) from Steve, who unfortunately cannot be on the call, but which is well set out
> 
> 5. Individual Board Member Recall - given the legal advice we have seen, do we need to put this back on the table as a WS1 power?
> 
> 6. AOC reviews update - can anyone on the call present these?
> 
> 7. Next Calls - make sure we are clear about when our next call/s are.
> 
> 8. Any Other Business
> 
> 
> :: Papers ::
> 
> You can find papers as follows: and our wiki page is https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/WP1+Draft+Documents 
> 
> Item 2 - Work Plan - I will email this around in 3-4 hrs, probably right on the "twelve hours before" deadline
> 
> Item 3 - no paper (all the mechanisms papers are on the Wiki and the comparative table is at https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888421/WP1-Mechanisms-Comparison-Table-v1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426855932000&api=v2) 
> 
> Item 4 - Stress Test 18 - circulated by Steve DelBianco at 0230 UTC today (1 Apr) with the subject line "Document for WP1 and WP2: Stress test 18 and proposed bylaws change regarding GAC advice"
> 
> Item 5 - Board Member recall - no paper as yet
> 
> Item 6 - AOC reviews update - circulated by Steve DelBianco at 17:09 UTC on 29 March with the subject line "Revised draft for bringing AoC Reviews into ICANN Bylaws"
> 
> Item 7 - this will relate to the Work Plan to be circulated.
> 
> 
> Thanks all, speak soon,
> 
> Jordan
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
> 
> Chief Executive 
> InternetNZ
> 
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz 
> Skype: jordancarter
> 
> A better world through a better Internet 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150401/2891efce/attachment.html>