[WP1] Draft Agenda for Call #7 WP1: 21h UTC on Wed 8 April

Wed Apr 8 20:37:03 UTC 2015

Dear Kavouss,

The material you are asking about is available as follows - see in line
below:

On 9 April 2015 at 06:27, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Jordan
> Pls kindly advise to include me in dial up process
> Kavouss
> Moreover, I see that once more new terminalogy is used
> We had
> *- The permanent CCWG model*
> *- The Community Council model,*
>

These two mechanism models were on the agenda in Istanbul. There hasn't
been further development since. Please see templates WP1-A and WP1-B in the
"Mechanisms" table on the Wiki:

https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/WP1+Draft+Documents

> *-The superboard model *
> *Is Permanant CCWG and Community Council the same group with different
> terminology or they are different group ,different model and different
> structure ?*
>

They are nearly the same, but please see the templates.

Alternatively have a look at the summary table:
WP1-Mechanisms-Comparison-Table-v1.pdf
<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888421/WP1-Mechanisms-Comparison-Table-v1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426855932000&api=v2>

> *What is Super Board Model?It is super Board omparedf to what Board ?
> ICANN bOARD OR WHAT '*
>

Please read the Adler advice I circulated yesterday, it sets out this model.

best
Jordan

> *Kavouss *
>
> 2015-04-08 20:06 GMT+02:00 Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>:
>
>> I think we need to hear from the legal advisors about their
>> recommendations before we ask them to focus on any particular model(s).
>> They will be presenting to us next week with their recommendations for our
>> way forward - which models / mechanisms to focus on and which to take off
>> the table.  So we need to hear that presentation before we ask them to
>> focus on any of the models.  We are hearing interesting new suggestion
>> about tweeking a designator model combined with contracts that may be worth
>> exploring.
>>
>> Can you confirm that the veto mechanism still part of this discussion in
>> WP1?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>>
>> On Apr 7, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear WP1 members,
>>
>> We have our next call coming up in around about 20 hours: 21h00-23h00 UTC
>> on Wednesday 8 April. *Please note it's a 2hr slot.*
>>
>> The draft agenda is as follows, subject to any additions proposed between
>> now and then:
>>
>>
>> *1. Agenda review*
>>
>> *2. Report back from CCWG meeting on 7 April*
>>
>> *3. Working through our draft Comment Report*
>> *We need general comments and specific comments on the overall approach,
>> and on specific items of disagreement, improvement, or just questions, so
>> we can update and then circulate an updated version for us to look at on
>> the next call.*
>>
>> *To be most economical with time, it would be good not to have specific
>> drafting comments dealt with verbally on the call - these would be most
>> helpful as comments bubbles or tracked changes in Word, or just in text in
>> emails responding to specific text from the paper.*
>>
>> *This will be the biggest item on our call.*
>>
>> *It's already apparent that another layer of detail will probably be
>> required.*
>>
>>
>> *4. Discussion (incl with the legal advisors) on how to work out our
>> mechanism*
>> *There are a decent list now of possible mechanisms developed by us -
>> membership/delegates, a group inside ICANN under the bylaws, SO/AC
>> processes - to which our legal advisors have offered additional suggestions
>> e.g. the very large super-board.*
>>
>> *We need to work out how to make a call on this.*
>>
>> *My suggestion as rapporteur is that we try to focus on one or two
>> options - the permanent CCWG/Community Council model, or the superboard
>> model that Adler have discussed - and ask the legal advisors which of those
>> models can deliver what we need, or whether they recommend a different
>> mechanism instead (and if so why).*
>>
>> *As prep I will update the table we began to discuss in Istanbul that
>> sets out the key features of the different mechanisms, and circulate it
>> later tonight.*
>>
>>
>> *5. Agree agenda for 10 & 13 April calls*
>>
>> *Current suggestions for 10 April:*
>> *- next version of our comment report*
>> *- agree what parts can be sent to CCWG as early notice for the 14 April
>> CCWG call*
>> *- focus on decision weights and thresholds for our powers and mechanisms
>> (who has the power)*
>>
>> *Current suggestions for 13 April:*
>> *- resolution on a mechanism to recommend to the CCWG*
>> *- final review of comments report before sending complete input to CCWG*
>>
>>
>> *6. Any Other Business*
>>
>>
>> Any other suggested agenda items, please let us all know ASAP.
>>
>>
>> cheers
>> Jordan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jordan Carter
>>
>> Chief Executive
>> *InternetNZ*
>>
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> Skype: jordancarter
>>
>> *A better world through a better Internet *
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> WP1 mailing list
>> WP1 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WP1 mailing list
>> WP1 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>>
>>
>

-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150409/bd3d6bb2/attachment-0001.html>