[WP1] Bringing AoC Reviews into ICANN Bylaws, v5 reflecting Paris Saturday discussion
Jordan Carter
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Mon Jul 20 21:25:49 UTC 2015
It's looking pretty good to me Steve. Let's sign out at WP1 on Wednesday
folks.
cheers
Jordan
On 21 July 2015 at 09:01, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org> wrote:
> Updated to reflect Saturday in Paris, where we said that commitments
> stated within the new gTLD and WHOIS reviews would stay in that section of
> the Bylaws, instead of moving them to the Core Values.
>
> I have noted 1 area with yellow highlighting for follow-up:
>
> In the chapeau on page 3 we note the need to define confidentiality and
> non-disclosure rules when the review team accesses documents that ICANN
> management says are confidential, sensitive, or proprietary.
>
> —Steve
>
>
>
> From: Steve DelBianco
> Date: Friday, July 17, 2015 at 7:40 AM
> To: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org"
> Cc: Jordan Carter, Avri Doria, "wp1 at icann.org"
> Subject: Bringing AoC Reviews into ICANN Bylaws, v4 reflecting Paris
> discussion
>
> Today (17-Jul) we reviewed and revised the proposal to bring AoC
> Reviews into the ICANN Bylaws.
>
> By my notes, here are the changes we agreed today:
>
> Preference for option 2 on team composition, so removed 3-May proposal
> and Option 1.
>
> Allow ATRT to *amend* these reviews, too.
>
> Add 1 ICANN board member to each review team under option 2. Note that
> our 3-May draft had a board member on each team.
>
> Bruce Tonkin suggested requiring review teams to *Prioritize* their
> recommendations. We heard several objections to making that a
> requirement, so I added it as a suggestion: "The review team should attempt
> to assign priorities to its recommendations."
>
>
> Remaining challenges:
>
>
> How to give review team access to ICANN Internal documents, while
> preventing disclosure/publication of information that is sensitive,
> confidential, or proprietary? Do we impose sanctions for unauthorized
> disclosure? HELP NEEDED HERE.
>
>
> Steve Crocker recommended changing the AoC commitments for
> WHOIS/Directory Services. We heard some agreement with that idea, but
> strong cautions about attempting to drop WHOIS commitments as part of the
> transition. Instead, amendments to the WHOIS/Directory Services review
> could be recommended by the first post-transition ATRT.
>
>
> —
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/> and
> http://blog.netchoice.org
> +1.703.615.6206
>
>
>
--
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*
04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter
*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150721/134a694b/attachment.html>
More information about the WP1
mailing list