[WP1] Agenda for Meeting #20 - 22 July @ 19h UTC

Wed Jul 22 19:11:43 UTC 2015

Some of these are implementation details and should not be considered gating issues for moving forward, but I wanted to identify a couple of questions that come to mind in reading Izumi’s paper:

  1.  Given the waiting period, is it the intention that any Bylaws change approved by the Board will have an effective date of 15/30 days past approval (whatever the period identified) passes, so that there’s time for the community process to follow?
  2.  Are there any requirements that the issues raised as the reason for community rejection of the Bylaws be raised within the earlier public comment over the proposed Bylaws changes?
  3.  There is reference in here to changes to mission, commitments and core values – aren’t those to be included in the fundamental Bylaws and therefore subject to a different process?  Or is this about changes that might result in parts of the Bylaws not being consistent with the mission/commitments/core values?

Thanks,

Sam

From: <wp1-bounces at icann.org<mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>>
Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:34 AM
To: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>>
Cc: "wp1 at icann.org<mailto:wp1 at icann.org>" <wp1 at icann.org<mailto:wp1 at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [WP1] Agenda for Meeting #20 - 22 July @ 19h UTC

Hi all

Attached is a PDF copy of Izumi's paper, and the original Word version again if you need it.

cheers
Jordan

On 22 July 2015 at 23:46, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
Hi all,

If you look at the "reference" there three points we want to consider, in addressing public comments.
Please find the attached changes from ver.2, which attempts to address these points.

Changes from ver.2:
* Clarify Review period is not the only opportunity for the community to provide feedback
   i. e. there will be a public comment for the community before excercising this power

   --> Review whether this influences the need to extend the review period
   --> Review whether this addresses concerns on possible delays in changes needed

* Additional explanation on how this power is not likely to destabilize ICANN
   --> Added the rationale provided by budget/strategic/operational plan section

Changes needed but not reflected:
* Explanation on how we described this how Member status can be created and maintained without undue costs, complexity, or liability
   --> Preferable to provide common explanation to be given under the section single membership model
   --> How we trigger the mechanism to bring ICANN to court in relation to this power

Discussion points:
* Does additional explanation on comment period give sufficient justification for short review period,
  or does we see the need to extend the review period to more than two weeks as requested?
* Does additional explanation give sufficient confidence on this power being a blocking factor to the changes needed?
* Does additional explanation give sufficient confidence this power still maintains stability to ICANN?
* How do we address "Changes needed but not reflected" issues?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference: Points raised on the public comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* The community review period
   - CCWG needs to agree on the alternative
   - Alternative options expressed from the public comment:
     a) 30 days
     b) 60 days
     c) 15-30 calendar days
     d) The end of the next ICANN meeting that begins no sooner than one month after the Board posts notice of adoption
        Prior to such changes becoming effective

* Explain member structure
   - Requested to explain how Member status can be created and maintained without undue costs, complexity, or liability (325)
   - Needs an explanation once the mechanism is fixed

* Consider mechanisms for limiting procedural impasse and possible delays

* Consider a cap on the number of times this power can be utilized.
    -->No consensus to reflect

* Increase compostions other than ccNSO and GAC (341)
    -->No consensus to reflect

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 2015/07/22 20:12, Jordan Carter wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am building off Grace's email below to build the agenda for the meeting
> in eight hours or so - forgive the formatting.
>
> On 22 July 2015 at 20:36, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> *22 July - meeting #20*
>>
>> 1. Community Model
>>    - overall description of CMSM model (first WP1 review of text, follows
>> CCWG discussion on 21 July) [*Grace* and *Jordan* first draft] ��� sent to
>> WP1 list
>>    - voting weights (update following Paris, *finalise* if poss) [*Alan*] ���
>> sent to WP1 list in Jordan's email around 11.04am UTC
>>    - Community Forum (first WP1 review of text, replacement for ICANN
>> Community Council) [*Alan* and *Jordan*]��� sent to WP1 list in Jordan's
>> email around 11.04am UTC
>>
>> 2. Fundamental Bylaws (review if anything outstanding from CCWG discussion
>> on 21 July, finalise) [*Jordan*] ��� same text as previously circulated.
>>
>> 3. Standard Bylaws (review if any other changes, *finalise* if poss) [
>> *Izumi*] ��� sent to WP1 list by Izumi around the same time as this email
>>
>> 4. AOC Reviews into the ICANN Bylaws (*finalise* if poss) [*Steve*] ���
>> sent to WP1 list, needs staff revision before call
>>
>>
> Then items 5 and 6 are a bit different to those previously identified, and
> there's a new #7:
>
> 5. Removal of Individual Directors (review, choose option, *agree for CCWG
> on 23 July*) ��� sent to WP1 by Jordan just before 11am UTC, building on
> Alan's draft
>
> 6. Recall of the entire ICANN Board (review material from lawyers, *agree
> for CCWG on 23 July*) ��� sent to WP1 list by Jordan around 19h20 on 21 July
>
> 7. ICANN Budget (review Jonathan's updated paper) ��� sent to WP1 list by
> Jonathan Zuck a few hours ago.
>
> Then 7 below becomes 8.
>
>> 7. Identification of any other bits of work we need to do to wrap this up [
>> *EVERYONE*]
>>
>>
> 9. Agree Agenda outline for meeting #21.
>
>
> Thanks all, speak with you in ~8 hours.
>
>
> Jordan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org<mailto:WP1 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>

_______________________________________________
WP1 mailing list
WP1 at icann.org<mailto:WP1 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1

--
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150722/a6253bb2/attachment-0001.html>