[WP1] Another summary example - Q8 - rejection of budget/plans

[Jordan Carter]

Hi all

Here is another example for your consideration.

best
Jordan


Summary:

There were twenty-two comments in this section.

17 comments suggested agreement; 11 comments noted concerns.

There were no confusion rated comments.

There were two divergent rated comments.

There was broad agreement that this power would enhance ICANN accountability,
but significant concern that this power would have to be implemented in a
way that does not compromise ICANN’s effectiveness.

The main issue/s or concerns:


   -

   Impact on ICANN’s operational effectiveness arising from this power
   -

   Desire for more incorporation of all relevant community input in the
   planning process, so as to make rejection less likely


Specific concerns or suggestions for further follow up and WP1/CCWG
discussion:


   -

   Greater transparency earlier in the process & more complete reporting
   (270)
   -

   Planning process must deal with all input on a fair and equal basis (271)
   -

   Better quality staff/board/community interactions before plans are
   approved (272)
   -

   Limit rejection of a plan to once per cycle (273)
   -

   Limit rejection of a plan to twice per cycle (281)
   -

   Concern for impact of sustained rejection, some limit (275, 277, 283,
   286, 289)
   -

   Improved engagement and dialogue to prevent matters coming to the point
   of rejection (276, 282, 283, 285)
   -

   Doubtful of value or effectiveness, opposed to strengthening (278)
   -

   Need greater IANA budget transparency (288)
   -

   Clarify that aim is not to re-write a budget in the community mechanism,
   but to return to Board for adjustment (288)


Proposed CCWG response/approach to resolution


   -

   WS2 will look at the planning process to improve quality of engagement &
   inclusion of input between Board, staff and community, and lead to a lower
   likelihood of plan rejection
   -

   CCWG will consider limit to number of times a plan/budget can be rejected
   - CCWG will elaborate on caretaker approach where a plan/budget is
   rejected to minimise operational impact


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150613/8bacebcf/attachment-0001.html>