[WP1] Thanks, next work steps (pls read)

[Greg Shatan]

Matthew,

This is a good observation and question, and a good idea.  I would have to
look back through Sidley's work product to see if there was a singular
document that did the trick.  Or we could ask them.

Greg

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

>  Hi
>
> One things that comes through clearly in the submissions is the lack of
> clarity/the confusion over how the membership model/UAs will work.  While
> Sidley have done a number of pieces on the these two elements I am not sure
> that anyone doc answers the question of how would the UAs be actually
> formed and how they would work in practice (almost in step by step form).
> If they have can someone point me to it.  If they have not - should/could
> they?
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 6/14/2015 11:01 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Thanks for the calls in the past few days and the work done assessing the
> public comments so far.
>
>  We have some commentary in our google doc on each comment, some
> summaries prepared, and a sense of the key issues that have come through.
> Great progress.
>
>  So we have some work to do to finalse outputs for the CCWG face to face,
> with a "freeze" on documents due at 2359UTC on Tuesday 16 June.
>
>  We've agreed three output documents for the CCWG:
>
>  A. A high level Issues Paper, that sets out the state of play with some
> critical matters still for debate (UAs, enforceability, ???)
>
>  B. A paper with all the summaries in one place (for each question/set of
> questions), that also includes the separate comment analysis piece for the
> mechanism
>
>  C. The full comments document with our thinking and replies to each
> element of comment
>
>
>  The things we need to do and hoped for / agreed volunteers (people
> identified in *bold*) - and realistically speaking, we need to have this
> sorted by *2359 on Mon 15th* to allow the WP to review documents.
>
>  So - some quick work needed!
>
>
>  1. Be confident in our summaries. *All* to review.
>
>  2. Special care with the community mechanism comment analysis and
> Summary -* Matthew Shears* to be asked to review analysis and summary
>
>  3. *Drafters for each section* to review and analyse the new comments
> imported today (identified in pink and with different identifier numbers)
> - that is *Steve Avri Fiona Keith Roelof Matthew Robin Jordan *
>
>  4. Draft the high level Issues Paper, with people chipping in on the
> lists with topic suggestions, and *Jonathan Z* doing lead drafting on the
> first part.
>
>
>  I think that is all - if anyone picked up additional action items that
> need doing, please advise ASAP.
>
>
>  best,
> Jordan
>
>  --
>   Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> *A better world through a better Internet *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing listWP1 at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
> --
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)+ 44 (0)771 247 2987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150615/b791a80e/attachment.html>