[WP1] Thanks, next work steps (pls read)

[Jordan Carter]

Thank you Jonathan for this - I like it.

I've attached same in PDF for those who are keen on that format.

J

On 16 June 2015 at 23:12, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org> wrote:

>  Okay, after I accidentally volunteered on the last call to try and boil
> down the enforceability discussion to a bite sized morsel, I immediately
> regretted it but took a shot at it anyway. You all know where I stand but I
> attempted to be neutral. I welcome any feedback on how to be more so. I’m
> sure I left out everyone’s favorite detail but my goal was to reduce this
> to the philosophical question it should be and lay to rest of the factual
> questions that are all but resolved.
>
>
>
> Ducking now…
>
>
>
> *From:* wp1-bounces at icann.org [mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Jordan Carter
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 14, 2015 6:01 PM
> *To:* wp1 at icann.org
> *Subject:* [WP1] Thanks, next work steps (pls read)
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
> Thanks for the calls in the past few days and the work done assessing the
> public comments so far.
>
>
>
> We have some commentary in our google doc on each comment, some summaries
> prepared, and a sense of the key issues that have come through. Great
> progress.
>
>
>
> So we have some work to do to finalse outputs for the CCWG face to face,
> with a "freeze" on documents due at 2359UTC on Tuesday 16 June.
>
>
>
> We've agreed three output documents for the CCWG:
>
>
>
> A. A high level Issues Paper, that sets out the state of play with some
> critical matters still for debate (UAs, enforceability, ???)
>
>
>
> B. A paper with all the summaries in one place (for each question/set of
> questions), that also includes the separate comment analysis piece for the
> mechanism
>
>
>
> C. The full comments document with our thinking and replies to each
> element of comment
>
>
>
>
>
> The things we need to do and hoped for / agreed volunteers (people
> identified in *bold*) - and realistically speaking, we need to have this
> sorted by *2359 on Mon 15th* to allow the WP to review documents.
>
>
>
> So - some quick work needed!
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. Be confident in our summaries. *All* to review.
>
>
>
> 2. Special care with the community mechanism comment analysis and Summary -* Matthew
> Shears* to be asked to review analysis and summary
>
>
>
> 3. *Drafters for each section* to review and analyse the new comments
> imported today (identified in pink and with different identifier numbers)
> - that is *Steve Avri Fiona Keith Roelof Matthew Robin Jordan *
>
>
>
> 4. Draft the high level Issues Paper, with people chipping in on the lists
> with topic suggestions, and *Jonathan Z* doing lead drafting on the first
> part.
>
>
>
>
>
> I think that is all - if anyone picked up additional action items that
> need doing, please advise ASAP.
>
>
>
>
>
> best,
>
> Jordan
>
>
>
> --
>
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> *A better world through a better Internet *
>



-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150616/59953061/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Enforceability of Community Designated Powers.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 45214 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150616/59953061/EnforceabilityofCommunityDesignatedPowers-0001.pdf>