[WP1] Thanks, next work steps (pls read)

[Roelof Meijer]

Dear Jonathan,

Quite a readable piece, and in my opinion you hit the key issue well.
You did not really succeed however, in your attempt to be neutral. It doesn’t read that way.
Probably because of the use of "It stands to reason that…” to introduce one view, and " However, there are some within the community that believe…” to introduce the other.

Cheers,

Roelof

From: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org<mailto:JZuck at actonline.org>>
Date: dinsdag 16 juni 2015 13:12
To: Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>>, "wp1 at icann.org<mailto:wp1 at icann.org>" <wp1 at icann.org<mailto:wp1 at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [WP1] Thanks, next work steps (pls read)

Okay, after I accidentally volunteered on the last call to try and boil down the enforceability discussion to a bite sized morsel, I immediately regretted it but took a shot at it anyway. You all know where I stand but I attempted to be neutral. I welcome any feedback on how to be more so. I’m sure I left out everyone’s favorite detail but my goal was to reduce this to the philosophical question it should be and lay to rest of the factual questions that are all but resolved.

Ducking now…

From: wp1-bounces at icann.org<mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jordan Carter
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 6:01 PM
To: wp1 at icann.org<mailto:wp1 at icann.org>
Subject: [WP1] Thanks, next work steps (pls read)

Hi all

Thanks for the calls in the past few days and the work done assessing the public comments so far.

We have some commentary in our google doc on each comment, some summaries prepared, and a sense of the key issues that have come through. Great progress.

So we have some work to do to finalse outputs for the CCWG face to face, with a "freeze" on documents due at 2359UTC on Tuesday 16 June.

We've agreed three output documents for the CCWG:

A. A high level Issues Paper, that sets out the state of play with some critical matters still for debate (UAs, enforceability, ???)

B. A paper with all the summaries in one place (for each question/set of questions), that also includes the separate comment analysis piece for the mechanism

C. The full comments document with our thinking and replies to each element of comment


The things we need to do and hoped for / agreed volunteers (people identified in bold) - and realistically speaking, we need to have this sorted by 2359 on Mon 15th to allow the WP to review documents.

So - some quick work needed!


1. Be confident in our summaries. All to review.

2. Special care with the community mechanism comment analysis and Summary - Matthew Shears to be asked to review analysis and summary

3. Drafters for each section to review and analyse the new comments imported today (identified in pink and with different identifier numbers) - that is Steve Avri Fiona Keith Roelof Matthew Robin Jordan

4. Draft the high level Issues Paper, with people chipping in on the lists with topic suggestions, and Jonathan Z doing lead drafting on the first part.


I think that is all - if anyone picked up additional action items that need doing, please advise ASAP.


best,
Jordan

--
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150619/25579b9f/attachment-0001.html>