[Party1] Inbound work from and outbound work to WP2

[Jordan Carter]

Yep, that's right.

To me, that suggestion is a blend of some powers (what could be vetoed) and
a specific mechanism to deliver them. We need to make sure the powers exist
and that there is a mechanism. It might end up being your proposed
mechanism or might not.

Would you do a template for the community veto, Robin?

cheers
Jordan


On 3 March 2015 at 10:29, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> Thanks, Jordan,  It looked like the "Community Veto" proposal had also
> been moved into WP1, yes?
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>
> Hello WP1 members,
>
> I had a chat with Becky yesterday and below are the work items that are
> proposed to transfer* from WP2 to WP1.*
>
>
> 1. Ombudsman
>
> We would keep (and Becky would not progress) community or noncom
> appointment of the Ombudsman (noting this is Work Stream 2 -
> post-transition - and is therefore on hold).
>
>
> 2. Mechanisms
>
> We would develop details for all the "mechanisms" that are actually
> already listed in the second table of our work summary - Becky's work plan
> had included them.
>
>
> This relates to the broader discussion Becky and I had which is that her
> WP would focus its time and energy on improvements to existing mechanisms
> (which largely focuses on review and redress, things that are "triggered")
> as well as the standards on which such action is based. Our WP1 would focus
> on new mechanisms and powers, as it has largely done so far, most of which
> are non-triggered.
>
>
> This then leads to the following *Work Items from our list being
> transferred to WP2:*
>
> WP1-5A - clarifying ICANN's limited technical mission - is part of the
> standards and review&redress focus of WP2
>
> WP1-6C - ombudsman standing for IRP - this would also be an improvement to
> the redress mechanism of the IRP, and would fit with WP2 (noting it's also
> WS2-post-transition)
>
>
> Most of these allocations are noted in the PDF I circulated yesterday,
> which is attached again for your easy reference.
>
> We can discuss this on Thursday. At the moment it doesn't require us to do
> anything other than focus our efforts on the "mechanisms" we might build.
> So far Roelof has kindly developed the Supervisory Board concept, but we
> need to do some work on the other mechanisms.
>
>
> cheers,
> Jordan
>
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> *A better world through a better Internet *
>
>  <WP1-WorkStatus-CCWG-ACCT-2.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
>


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150303/d2a7c483/attachment.html>