[Party1] WP1: Draft 5, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws changes

[Jordan Carter]

Can this paper be a feature of our next WP1 meeting's discussion?

cheers
Jordan

On 9 March 2015 at 10:03, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> Thanks very much for this discussion paper, Matthew.  A few comments /
> suggestions redlined in the attached draft.
>
> Thanks again,
> Robin
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Matthew Shears wrote:
>
>
> Dear all - attached please find an overview of other elements of the AoC
> that need to be further discussed within the WP as well as some suggestions
> that could be brought into the bylaws.
>
> Looking forward to your thoughts/comments.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 3/4/2015 5:38 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
>
>  Regarding Kavouss' point about the ATRT assessing the 'effectiveness of
> the GAC'.
> A deeper read of ICANN bylaws tells me that 'effectiveness' is part of
> what the structural reviews are about.   So while these structural reviews
> don't actually assess the effectiveness of the GNSO, CCNSO, etc., they do
> make recommendations about how to improve the effectiveness.  (see bylaws
> below)
>
>   Section 4. PERIODIC REVIEW OF ICANN STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS
>
>  1. The Board shall cause a periodic review of the performance and
> operation of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization
> Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental Advisory
> Committee), and the Nominating Committee by an entity or entities
> independent of the organization under review. The goal of the review, to be
> undertaken pursuant to such criteria and standards as the Board shall
> direct, shall be to determine (i) whether that organization has a
> continuing purpose in the ICANN structure, and (ii) if so, whether any
> change in structure or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness.
>
>
>   From: Steve DelBianco
> Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 5:27 PM
> To: Jordan Carter, "wp1 at icann.org"
> Cc: Matthew Shears, Fiona Asonga, ACCT-Staff
> Subject: WP1: Draft 5, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws
> changes
>
>    Draft v5 (attached) reflects the discussion/suggestions from our call
> on 4-Mar-2015.
>
>    From: Steve DelBianco
> Date: Monday, March 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM
> To: Jordan Carter, "wp1 at icann.org"
> Cc: Matthew Shears, Fiona Asonga, ACCT-Staff
> Subject: WP1: Draft 4, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws
> changes
>
>    here's an updated doc for Matthew, Fiona, and me, where we are
> importing the *Affirmation of Commitments* Reviews into the ICANN
> Bylaws.  The last 2 pages of this doc show proposed bylaws language for all
> 4 reviews.
>
>   Matthew Shears also has draft language regarding other commitments from
> AoC that should be considered for import into ICANN bylaws.
>
>  Best,
>  Steve
>
>
>
>  <Proposals for incorporating additional elements of the AoC v1.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
>
>


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150309/cfa1bc1b/attachment.html>