[WP1] Updated Memo on Request on Sole Designator

Tue Nov 10 00:15:37 UTC 2015

+ 1  Brett's suggestion to model the decision-making based upon 
participation and varying thresholds (if that even makes sense), and/but

+ 1 Jordan's concern that 4 participating SO/ACs maybe to few for the 
current model

Matthew

On 09/11/2015 20:45, Jordan Carter wrote:
> hi Brett,
>
> Such matrices of decision are not being drafted. If you are able to 
> attend the call in around ~15 hours, I think it would be useful to 
> talk this through. As I've said before, if we are down to four SO/ACs 
> participating, to my mind that's too small an orbit to use the current 
> model.
>
> Jordan
>
> On 10 November 2015 at 08:34, Schaefer, Brett 
> <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org <mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>> wrote:
>
>     Jordan,
>
>     I appreciate the explanation provided in the memo.
>
>     However, I note that the decision matrix remains unchanged in that
>     it requires support from 4 SOs/ACs to exercise powers 1, 2, 5, and
>     7. The operating assumption is that GNSO, ccNSO, ASO, and ALAC
>     will participate. I believe that they will, but it would be good
>     to get confirmation even with the knowledge that such a statement
>     should not be considered an endorsement of the CCWG proposal.
>
>     Also, as we discussed in the previous CCWG WP1 call, there is a
>     possible complication if RSSAC, as expected, decides not to
>     participate and GAC either (1) decides not to participate, (2)
>     decides not to participate immediately, but announces its desire
>     to be allowed participate at some future date, or (3) cannot reach
>     a consensus position.
>
>     In that case, unanimous support by the 4 SOs/ACs assumed above to
>     participate would be required in order to exercise powers 1,2, 5,
>     and 7. I don’t think that unanimous support was supposed to be
>     required for exercise of the community powers.
>
>     Until we have confirmation of which SOs and ACs (other than SSAC
>     which has explicitly stated its intention not to participate) will
>     be participating in the mechanism, we need to plan out possible
>     scenarios. For this reason, I think we need to provide decision
>     matrices based on varying levels of participation. Is this being
>     drafted?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Brett
>
>     *From:*wp1-bounces at icann.org <mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org <mailto:wp1-bounces at icann.org>] *On
>     Behalf Of *Jordan Carter
>     *Sent:* Sunday, November 08, 2015 5:51 PM
>     *To:* Accountability Cross Community; wp1 at icann.org
>     <mailto:wp1 at icann.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [WP1] Updated Memo on Request on Sole Designator
>
>     ... and in PDF
>
>     J
>
>     On 9 November 2015 at 11:50, Jordan Carter
>     <jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>> wrote:
>
>     Dear all - for your reading pleasure and for the lists record.
>
>     Jordan
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     BrettSchaefer
>     Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
>     Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National
>     Security and Foreign Policy
>     The Heritage Foundation
>     214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
>     Washington, DC 20002
>     202-608-6097
>     heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
>
>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     From: *Gregory, Holly* <holly.gregory at sidley.com
>     <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>>
>     Date: 7 November 2015 at 13:48
>     Subject: Updated Memo on Request on Sole Designator
>
>     Dear Co-Chairs, Jordan and Staff,
>
>     Attached please find a substantially reorganized and revised memo
>     on how  the Sole Designator would be made operational, to replace
>     the memo that was sent to you last week.  The changes are largely
>     in the nature of clarifications and we have addressed the point
>     requested below as well. We request that this memo be posted to
>     replace the prior memo.
>
>     Please let us know if you have any questions.
>
>     Kind regards,
>     Holly and Rosemary
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Jordan Carter
>
>     Chief Executive
>     *InternetNZ*
>
>
>     +64-4-495-2118 <tel:%2B64-4-495-2118> (office) | +64-21-442-649
>     <tel:%2B64-21-442-649> (mob)
>     Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
>     Skype: jordancarter
>
>     Web: www.internetnz.nz <http://www.internetnz.nz>
>
>
>     /A better world through a better Internet /
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Skype: jordancarter
> Web: www.internetnz.nz <http://www.internetnz.nz>
>
> /A better world through a better Internet /
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20151109/9e7429ee/attachment.html>