<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Mar 8, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Matthew Shears wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
Dear all - attached please find an overview of other elements of the
AoC that need to be further discussed within the WP as well as some
suggestions that could be brought into the bylaws.<br>
<br>
Looking forward to your thoughts/comments.<br>
<br>
Matthew<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/4/2015 5:38 PM, Steve DelBianco
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:E99EF6BF-DB61-457B-94C2-DBB3FD326F30@netchoice.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;
font-size: 16px;">
<div>
<div>Regarding Kavouss’ point about the ATRT assessing the
'effectiveness of the GAC’. </div>
<div>A deeper read of ICANN bylaws tells me that
‘effectiveness’ is part of what the structural reviews are
about. So while these structural reviews don’t actually
assess the effectiveness of the GNSO, CCNSO, etc., they do
make recommendations about how to improve the effectiveness.
(see bylaws below)</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;
font-size: 16px;">
<br>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">Section 4. PERIODIC
REVIEW OF ICANN STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">1. The Board shall cause
a periodic review of the performance and operation of each
Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization
Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the
Governmental Advisory Committee), and the Nominating
Committee by an entity or entities independent of the
organization under review. The goal of the review, to be
undertaken pursuant to such criteria and standards as the
Board shall direct, shall be to determine (i) whether that
organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN
structure, and (ii) i<span style="background-color:
rgb(255, 255, 0);">f so, whether any change in structure
or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness.</span></font></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;
font-size: 16px;">
<br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt;
text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Steve DelBianco<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, March
4, 2015 at 5:27 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Jordan Carter, "<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:wp1@icann.org">wp1@icann.org</a>"<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Matthew Shears,
Fiona Asonga, ACCT-Staff<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>WP1: Draft 5,
with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws changes<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-size: 16px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>
<div>Draft v5 (attached) reflects the
discussion/suggestions from our call on 4-Mar-2015.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt;
text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium
none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in;
PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP:
#b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none;
PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Steve
DelBianco<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Monday,
March 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Jordan
Carter, "<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:wp1@icann.org">wp1@icann.org</a>"<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Matthew
Shears, Fiona Asonga, ACCT-Staff<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>WP1:
Draft 4, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as
Bylaws changes<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color:
rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: Calibri,
sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>
<div>here’s an updated doc for Matthew, Fiona, and
me, where we are importing the
<i>Affirmation of Commitments</i> Reviews into
the ICANN Bylaws. The last 2 pages of this doc
show proposed bylaws language for all 4 reviews.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word;
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break:
after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size:
16px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>Matthew Shears also has draft language
regarding other commitments from AoC that
should be considered for import into ICANN
bylaws.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div id="">
<div>Best,</div>
<div>
<div>Steve </div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</span>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<span><Proposals for incorporating additional elements of the AoC v1.docx></span>_______________________________________________<br>WP1 mailing list<br><a href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a><br>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>