<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Dear Colleagues,<br>
    <br>
    It is greatly valuable to our work at this stage to identify areas
    where different views are expressed. It is even more valuable when
    they can be voiced with :<br>
    - alternate proposals (such as, what would the "community veto
    mechanism" look like in the constituency-based approach ?)<br>
    - identification of the benefits of the proposed approach to enhance
    accountability, as defined in our definition document. <br>
    <br>
    The criteria, rightly referenced by Kavouss below, can easily be
    derived from these definitions. Does one option provide greater
    transparency ? Enable accountability to a larger set of stakeholder
    ? Improve independence ? Provide better checks and balances ? <br>
    <br>
    We will certainly expand on these criteria very shortly. <br>
    <br>
    Best<br>
    Mathieu<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 12/03/2015 22:28, Kavouss Arasteh a
      écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:0E80BA9A-8AF8-4C67-879F-2C26869110DE@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <div>Dear All,</div>
      <div>Yes there are some evident criteria to address the issue of
        proportionality.</div>
      <div>Instead of defending one and offending the ethers create an
        unhealthy </div>
      <div>Atmosphere. Instead let us to make valid reasoning and
        develop associated criteria</div>
      <div>Regars</div>
      <div>Kavouss. </div>
      <div>   <br>
        <br>
        Sent from my iPhone</div>
      <div><br>
        On 12 Mar 2015, at 21:11, &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="mailto:olivier.muron@orange.com">olivier.muron@orange.com</a>&gt;
        &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="mailto:olivier.muron@orange.com">olivier.muron@orange.com</a>&gt;
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=windows-1252">
          <div><span></span></div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;">I
                fully agree with Greg: <span style="background-color:
                  rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">the GNSO represent the
                  largest part of ICANN’s activities , the other
                  supporting organizations like the ASO and the ccNSO
                  only rely on ICANN for the overall level of policies
                  (global policies), and for them most of the policy
                  work is done at the regional or national level.
                  Moreover </span><span style="background-color:
                  rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">the GNSO represents a very
                  broad diversity of stakeholders, each with a very
                  specific point of view on the issues handled by ICANN.</span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span
                  style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br>
                </span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><b
                  style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><span
                    lang="EN-US">I think that the GNSO should benefit
                    from a specific representation based on its
                    constituencies</span></b><span
                  style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"
                  lang="EN-US">, that fully represent the diversity of
                  the stakeholders involved</span><span
                  style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"
                  lang="EN-US">, and take into account the policy work
                  done at ICANN level.</span></p>
              <br>
              <span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">One
                should note that in Work Area 2 inventory of input from
                Public Comment, reference is made to a SO/AC Group where
                GNSO is indeed represented at the Constituency level.</span></div>
            <div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br>
              </span></div>
            <div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Regards,</span></div>
            <div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Olivier</span></div>
            <div><br>
              Le 12 mars 2015 à 18:51, Greg Shatan &lt;<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>&gt;
              a écrit :<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr">I would be opposed to a group composed
                  solely of SO and AC chairs.  It is a mistake to treat
                  all SO's and AC's as equivalent organizations.  They
                  are not.  Specifically, the GNSO consists of 4
                  separate Stakeholder Groups, two of which are composed
                  of 2-3 separate Constituencies.  One of those
                  Stakeholder Groups, the Registry SG, is really the
                  equivalent of the ccNSO, and when the new gTLD program
                  wraps up, the RySG will represent more registries than
                  the ccNSO (even including the non-ccNSO ccTLDs). 
                  Other Stakeholder Groups include the Registrar SG, the
                  Non-Commercial SG, essentially the equivalent of
                  "Civil Society," and the Commercial SG, essentially
                  the equivalent of the "Private Sector."  (And that
                  does not even take the substantial variation at the
                  Constituency level into account -- the ISPs, for
                  example, are stuffed into the Commercial SG.)  
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Are we suggesting that the ccNSO should share a
                    seat with representatives of, registrars, the
                    private sector and civil society? No -- that would
                    seem absurd.  It's no less absurd to do that on the
                    gTLD side.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>The GNSO and its hierarchical structure exist for
                    a particular purpose -- to develop policy
                    recommendations for gTLDs.  Using that structure for
                    other purposes is an abuse of the structure, and
                    ultimately a distortion and an abuse of the
                    multistakeholder model.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Greg Shatan</div>
                </div>
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:57
                    PM, Roelof Meijer <span dir="ltr">
                      &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl"
                        target="_blank">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>&gt;</span>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      <div style="word-wrap:break-word">
                        <div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">All,</div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Not
                            so much a content reaction, but the template
                            set me thinking.</div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><font
                              face="Calibri,sans-serif">Somehow,
                              referring to your "</font><font
                              color="#262626" size="3"><i>This challenge
                                mechanism would only apply to a narrow
                                set of predetermined high impact board
                                decisions such as the adoption of the
                                organization’s strategic plan, approval
                                of the budget, approval of bylaws, etc</i>.</font><font
                              color="#262626"><span
                                style="font-size:15px">”</span></font><font
                              color="#262626" size="3"> we
                              should „merge" or „synchronize” this with
                              the work done on powers 1A, 1B and 1C
                              (Vetoing changing to the bylaws, vetoing
                              the budget/strategic plan, vetoing board
                              action in conflict with bylaws).</font></div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Veto’s
                            with different impact should have different
                            voting thresholds, but the rest of the
                            „ingredients” of the powers will mostly be
                            the same and I have the impression that as a
                            WS/WG we are pretty much aligned on those
                            ingredients. That also applies for template
                            7A- removing the board of directors, that
                            Jordan presented in yesterdays call.</div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">The
                            most difficult part to discuss and decide
                            upon now (and we are not yet aligned there
                            and seem to be kind of touching it lightly
                            so far) is the overarching mechanism to
                            apply the powers. We identified: existing
                            SO/AC structure, permanent CCWG, Statutory
                            delegates or members, supervisory board. In
                            his template 7A, Jordan introduces an
                            additional one, "Community Council", and
                            provides alternative proposals for its
                            compilation.</div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">The
                            group of community representatives that vote
                            on vetoing a board decision, intention,
                            action, budget, removing the board etc (the
                            group that administers the powers we
                            identified) can –and should in my opinion-
                            be the same for all those powers.</div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">In
                            Frankfurt we decided to identify the
                            requirements first and then determine the
                            best fitting mechanism.</div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">We
                            have the requirements (powers to be given to
                            the community) largely, we are pretty much
                            aligned on them. So we really have to start
                            working on the mechanism to apply: what
                            should the composition of the group (who
                            should be in it, how do they get in:
                            elected/appointed/ex officio, how do they
                            get recalled) , how are positions mandated,
                            decisions made and how do we fix al that in
                            the bylaws. I am aware that we will need
                            legal advice on that, but I don’t think that
                             we have to wait with everything for that.</div>
                          <div title="Page 1">
                            <div>
                              <div>
                                <div>
                                  <p><font color="#262626" size="3"> And
                                      let</font><font color="#262626"><span
                                        style="font-size:15px">’</span></font><font
                                      color="#262626" size="3">s make it
                                      as effective, simple and
                                      executable as possible. I noted
                                      again during the call yesterday,
                                      that quite a few of us (I admit, I
                                      am one of them) are in favor of
                                      the group (whatever it will be
                                      called in the end) be composed of
                                      SO and AC chairs. Although we
                                      should not limit ourselves to
                                      that, I submit that we should
                                      really explore that option.</font></p>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <div
                            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
                            <div><font color="#000000"><font
                                  face="Calibri">Best,</font></font></div>
                            <div><font color="#000000"><font
                                  face="Calibri"><br>
                                </font></font></div>
                            <div><font color="#000000"><font
                                  face="Calibri">Roelof</font></font></div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                        <div
                          style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
                        </div>
                        <span
                          style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
                          <div
                            style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium
                            none;BORDER-LEFT:medium
                            none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df
                            1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium
                            none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
                            <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Robin
                            Gross &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org"
                              target="_blank">robin@ipjustice.org</a>&gt;<br>
                            <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>woensdag
                            11 maart 2015 22:15<br>
                            <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a
                              moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="mailto:wp1@icann.org"
                              target="_blank">wp1@icann.org</a>" &lt;<a
                              moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="mailto:wp1@icann.org"
                              target="_blank">wp1@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
                            <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[Party1]
                            Accountability Mechanism Template WP-1-F |
                            Community Veto Proposal<br>
                          </div>
                          <div>
                            <div class="h5">
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>
                                <div>
                                  <div><font><span
                                        style="font-size:10pt">
                                        <div>Attached please find the
                                          template completed for the
                                          proposal regarding a
                                          "community veto process". 
                                          <br>
                                          <br>
                                          Improvements, clarifications,
                                          suggestions, etc. are most
                                          welcome.<br>
                                          <br>
                                          Thanks,<br>
                                          Robin<br>
                                          <br>
                                        </div>
                                      </span></font></div>
                                  <div><font><span
                                        style="font-size:10pt">
                                        <div><br>
                                        </div>
                                      </span></font></div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </span></div>
                      <br>
                      _______________________________________________<br>
                      WP1 mailing list<br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a><br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1"
                        target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1</a><br>
                      <br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <br clear="all">
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  -- <br>
                  <div class="gmail_signature">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span
style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#17365d">Gregory
                            S. Shatan </span></b><b><span
                            style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#17365d">ï</span></b><b><span
style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#17365d"> </span></b><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#c0504d">Abelman

                            Frayne &amp; Schwab</span></b><span
                          style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#365f91">Partner</span></b><span><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#4f81bd"> </span></b></span><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#4f81bd">|
                            IP | Technology | Media | Internet</span></b><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#17365d">666
                            Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621</span></b><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy">Direct</span></b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy"> <span> </span></span><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1155cc">212-885-9253<span> </span><b>|<span> </span></b></span><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy">Main</span></b><span><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy"> </span></span><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1155cc">212-949-9022</span><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy">Fax</span></b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy"> <span> </span></span><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1155cc">212-949-9190<span> </span><b>|</b><span> </span></span><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy">Cell<span> </span></span></b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1155cc">917-816-6428</span><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><i><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy"><a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="mailto:gsshatan@lawabel.com"
                                target="_blank">gsshatan@lawabel.com</a></span></i></b><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy">ICANN-related:<span> </span><i><a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"
                                target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></i></span></b><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                      <p style="margin:0in 0in
0.0001pt;line-height:12pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><i><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:navy"><a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="http://www.lawabel.com/"
                                target="_blank">www.lawabel.com</a></span></i></b><span
style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"></span></p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
                <span>WP1 mailing list</span><br>
                <span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a></span><br>
                <span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1</a></span><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <pre>_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
</pre>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
          <span>WP1 mailing list</span><br>
          <span><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a></span><br>
          <span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1</a></span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
WP1 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************
</pre>
  </body>
</html>