<div dir="ltr">Hi all<div><br></div><div>Roelof has hit on the key piece of work I was intending to spend some time on over the weekend: the reconciliation of the powers we have developed with the mechanisms they are implemented through.</div><div><br></div><div>What I am going to try and do is to present a sort of table that sets out the key models we have (SOs/ACs acting through a veto; permanent CCWG; standing body; delegates; members;) and identify common and different characteristics.</div><div><br></div><div>I'll also try and do a table of the powers that sets out decision methods and thresholds etc.</div><div><br></div><div>To assist me with this work, it would be AMAZING if as many templates as possible were complete and shared with the lists by the close of Friday UTC. </div><div><br></div><div>Welcome all the discussion so far and to come, of course.</div><div><br></div><div>cheers</div><div>Jordan<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 13 March 2015 at 05:57, Roelof Meijer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl" target="_blank">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
All,</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
Not so much a content reaction, but the template set me thinking.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<font face="Calibri,sans-serif">Somehow, referring to your "</font><font color="#262626" size="3"><i>This challenge mechanism would only apply to a narrow set of predetermined high impact board decisions such as the adoption of the organization’s strategic
plan, approval of the budget, approval of bylaws, etc</i>.</font><font color="#262626"><span style="font-size:15px">”</span></font><font color="#262626" size="3"> we should „merge" or „synchronize” this with the work done on powers 1A, 1B and 1C (Vetoing
changing to the bylaws, vetoing the budget/strategic plan, vetoing board action in conflict with bylaws).</font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
Veto’s with different impact should have different voting thresholds, but the rest of the „ingredients” of the powers will mostly be the same and I have the impression that as a WS/WG we are pretty much aligned on those ingredients. That also applies for template
7A- removing the board of directors, that Jordan presented in yesterdays call.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
The most difficult part to discuss and decide upon now (and we are not yet aligned there and seem to be kind of touching it lightly so far) is the overarching mechanism to apply the powers. We identified: existing SO/AC structure, permanent CCWG, Statutory
delegates or members, supervisory board. In his template 7A, Jordan introduces an additional one, "Community Council", and provides alternative proposals for its compilation.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
The group of community representatives that vote on vetoing a board decision, intention, action, budget, removing the board etc (the group that administers the powers we identified) can –and should in my opinion- be the same for all those powers.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
In Frankfurt we decided to identify the requirements first and then determine the best fitting mechanism.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
We have the requirements (powers to be given to the community) largely, we are pretty much aligned on them. So we really have to start working on the mechanism to apply: what should the composition of the group (who should be in it, how do they get in: elected/appointed/ex
officio, how do they get recalled) , how are positions mandated, decisions made and how do we fix al that in the bylaws. I am aware that we will need legal advice on that, but I don’t think that we have to wait with everything for that.</div>
<div title="Page 1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p><font color="#262626" size="3"> And let</font><font color="#262626"><span style="font-size:15px">’</span></font><font color="#262626" size="3">s make it as effective, simple and executable as possible. I noted again during the call yesterday, that quite
a few of us (I admit, I am one of them) are in favor of the group (whatever it will be called in the end) be composed of SO and AC chairs. Although we should not limit ourselves to that, I submit that we should really explore that option.</font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Best,</font></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Roelof</font></font></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Robin Gross <<a href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">robin@ipjustice.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>woensdag 11 maart 2015 22:15<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:wp1@icann.org" target="_blank">wp1@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:wp1@icann.org" target="_blank">wp1@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[Party1] Accountability Mechanism Template WP-1-F | Community Veto Proposal<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><font><span style="font-size:10pt">
<div>Attached please find the template completed for the proposal regarding a "community veto process".
<br>
<br>
Improvements, clarifications, suggestions, etc. are most welcome.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Robin<br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
<div><font><span style="font-size:10pt">
<div><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></span>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
WP1 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br><br>Chief Executive <br><b>InternetNZ</b><br><br>04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br><a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a> <br>Skype: jordancarter<br><br><i>A better world through a better Internet </i><br><br></div></div></div></div>
</div></div></div></div>