<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br></div><div><br>On 16 Jun 2015, at 19:15, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>The party who won the IRP.<span></span><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>How would the enforce the IRP decision. We've been advised that they don't have standing in court to commence enforcement proceedings, only members do.</div><div><br></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><br>On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, Malcolm Hutty <<a href="mailto:malcolm@linx.net">malcolm@linx.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">But if the Board chooses to disregard the IRP, who will enforce it if the SOACs are disinclined to do so?<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
> On 16 Jun 2015, at 18:35, Greg Shatan <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'gregshatanipc@gmail.com')">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> If the IRP is binding, the Board has no discretion to disregard it, even if the community attempts to instruct it to do so (and even if the community can wield "legal persons" in this attempt).<br>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote></body></html>