<div dir="ltr">Hi all<div><br></div><div>Please find attached some marked up text from Izumi, who has prepared us for our discussion on the community power of rejecting changes to the standard ICANN bylaws.</div><div><br></div><div>The notes below from Izumi summarise what has changed, and highlight some issues for discussion.</div><div><br>This item is on our agenda for the 13 July call.</div><div><br></div><div>best,</div><div>Jordan</div><div><br></div><div><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">Attached is how I have reflected the community feedback for 2nd Public Comment on Standard ByLaws changes.</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">There were not many changes needed but a few points which needs the CCWG to have further discussions.</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">See [Further Discussions] for more details.</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><b>[Status of Proposed CCWG response/approach to resolution (Developed by WP1)]</b></span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">Based on "WP1 Summaries by Question" from the Public Comments. No specific comments on this area observed at ICANN53.</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><a href="https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/First+Public+Comment+Review" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/First+Public+Comment+Review</a><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider extending the community review period from 2 weeks to a longer timeframe TBD</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> --> "2 weeks" deleted but alternative TBD</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will continue to explore and explain member structure</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> --> Not reflected: needs to fix the model first</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider lowering the vote threshold from 3/4 to 2/3</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> --> Reflected</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider mechanisms for limiting procedural impasse and possible delays</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> --> Not reflected: Needs discussions</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider a cap on the number of times this power can be utilized. Further clarification needed</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> --> Reflected</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><b>[Further Discussions]</b></span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider extending the community review period from 2 weeks to a longer timeframe TBD</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - CCWG needs to agree on the alternative</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Alternative options expressed from the public comment:</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> a) 30 days</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> b) 60 days</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> c) The end of the next ICANN meeting that begins no sooner than one month after the Board posts notice of adoption</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> d) Prior to such changes becoming effective</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will continue to explore and explain member structure</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Requested to explain how Member status can be created and maintained without undue costs, complexity, or liability (325)</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Needs an explanation once the mechanism is fixed</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Need confirmation with lawyers on how to respond</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider mechanisms for limiting procedural impasse and possible delays</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Needs to consider alternatives to two weeks, in balance with this point</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Needs to consider whether putting limits on the number of times for this power to be ultilized is sufficient</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* CCWG will consider a cap on the number of times this power can be utilized.</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Reflected but needs to confirm whether there are no concerns</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px">* How to address comment (341)</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Which requests to increase composition of SOs/ACs other than ccNSO and GAC</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"> - Out of scope to consider it at a part of this work but needs to consider how to respond</span><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8000001907349px"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br><br>Chief Executive <br><b>InternetNZ</b><br><br>04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br><a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a> <br>Skype: jordancarter<br><br><i>A better world through a better Internet </i><br><br></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>