<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br><br><br></div><div><br>On 18 Jul 2015, at 07:47, Jordan Carter <<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Sam, these are good questions to raise.<div><br></div><div>There's no way to mitigate the first concern in a process sense that I can think of.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>First, it seems to me that there would be a real possibility that a significant number of Board members could elect resign upon the triggering of the Board recall process, not even waiting around for the vote. We’d then be in a position that we’d have
a significantly reduced Board membership without a triggering event to get to the proposed interim board measures.</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br><div>Could the triggering event not be that the population of the Board falls below a threshold number, for any reason?</div><div><br></div><div>Malcolm. </div></body></html>