<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; " class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large; ">Below is an updated template for the Reconsideration Request Reforms taking into account the comments and suggestions received to date. There hasn't been a lot of discussion of this issue in the last couple of weeks, but it is extremely important we get key reforms into place as the RR process is one of ICANN's stated accountability mechanisms and was the source of much complaint leading up to this working group's formation. So please send other comments and suggestions regarding needed reforms to the RR process at your earliest opportunity. Thank you, Robin</span></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">------------</font></div><p class="MsoNormal"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Reminder: ICANN Bylaws, Art IV, Section 2 is on the Reconsideration Review Process <a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en" class="">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en</a></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br></font></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Template of Reconsideration Request Reforms</font></b></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><b class="">1. Standing</b><o:p class=""></o:p></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Amend "who" has proper standing to file a Reconsideration Request to widen its scope to include any party impacted by the ICANN decision / inaction. </font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><b class="">2. Standard of Review</b><o:p class=""></o:p></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Amend the standard of reviewing a Reconsideration Request to include a re-examination of the underlying merits of arguments and decisions. </font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Also broaden the types of decisions which can re-examined. </font></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Also, amend when BGC may "summarily" dismiss a request (for example: dismissal based on Requester not participating in a public comment period on the issue).</font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Make it clear that a frivolous claim amounts to a cost that would be extraordinary in nature (para 9). </font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">And in paragraph 9 (ii) delete the word “querulous” and in paragraph 9 (iii) add “actual” to “notice.”</font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><b class=""><span class=""><span style="font: normal normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; " class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"> </font><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Helvetica" size="4"><b>3.</b> </font></span></span><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Composition</font></b><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><o:p class=""></o:p></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Need less reliance on the legal dept to guide the BGC on its recommendations and more board member engagement in decisions.</font></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Amend rules so BGC does not have the option of making final decisions (RE: staff action/inaction and 3rd party panels) without fuller board briefing and discussion of the issues.</font></div><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><b class=""><span class=""><span style="font: normal normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; " class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">4. </font></span></span><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Selection</font></b></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">N/A</font></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><b class="">5. Decision-making</b><o:p class=""></o:p></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Transparency improvements are needed regarding the information that make up the decision-making process.</font></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Reconsideration Request decisions currently have "precedential value" - so a party affected by a previous decision should be able to challenge the previous decision to which his case is bound under precedent. However, if a precedent is over-ruled it does not re-open old cases.</font></div><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><b class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">6. Accessibility</font></b></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Extend the time deadline for filing a Reconsideration Request to <u class="">60 days</u> [from when Requester learns of decision]. </font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Currently, the deadline for filing is (generally) 15 days from when decision/action is taken and posted or when one can reasonably conclude action/decision will not happen.</font></div><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></p><p style="margin-left: 18.5pt; text-indent: -0.25in; " class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><b class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">7. Implementation</font></b></p><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Requestors may need a follow-up process regarding implementation of decision reconsidered.</font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><b class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"> </font></b></div><div class=""><b class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">8. Due process</font></b></div></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Provide all briefing materials supplied to board to Requester so that they may know the arguments against them and have an opportunity to respond (subject to legitimate and documented confidentiality requirements).</font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Final decisions should be issued sooner.</font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4">Requests for "urgent" reconsideration should be broadened and less subjective in criteria for acceptance of "urgency". Requests considered "Urgent" should take into account legitimate business needs for relative certainty of rules in a timely fashion.</font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span" size="4"><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>