[WP2] slightly revised mission, commitments, core values for discussion later today

[Mathieu Weill]

Dear WP2 colleagues,

I want to thank all of you for trying very hard to find agreement on all 
these topics. I appreciate how everyone is keeping an open mind.

I may have missed this in the discussions but what is the rationale for 
inserting the words "within their respective jurisdictions" in Core 
Value 7 (ex-11). I remember we had some pushback on this in Paris.

> While remaining rooted in the [private sector], including business 
> stakeholders, civil society, the technical community, and academia, 
> recognizing that governments and public authorities are responsible 
> for public policy_within their respective jurisdictions_and duly 
> taking into account the public policy advice of governments and public 
> authorities 

The proposed addition in Article XI  of the sentence below is also 
attracting some pushback.
> or where the Advisory Committee has not explained the specific 
> reason(s) for its advice.
My personal view is that it may not be most appropriate to have this 
criteria in the same sentence and at the same level as "not exceeding 
the Mission".

I also wonder whether we could find ATRT agreed language on the 
provision of rationales in support of advice. It seemed to me that these 
reviews had contributed to significant improvements in that regard and 
the use of "agreed language" often helps when time is short.

Best,

Le 21/07/2015 20:43, Burr, Becky a écrit :
> Whoops, apologies – will fix that in the discussion
>
> J. Beckwith Burr
>
> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>
> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / 
> becky.burr at neustar.biz <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz
>
>
> From: Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>
> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:36 PM
> To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at neustar.biz <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz>>
> Cc: "wp2 at icann.org <mailto:wp2 at icann.org>" <wp2 at icann.org 
> <mailto:wp2 at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [WP2] slightly revised mission, commitments, core values 
> for discussion later today
>
> Looks good - except it is missing the critical word of "not".  So it 
> should read:
>
> /[...] ICANN shall have no authority to act or refrain from acting in 
> response to inputadvice from an Advisory Committee where such advice 
> would require ICANN to exceed its Mission or violate these Bylaws or 
> where the Advisory Committee has not explained the specific reason(s) 
> for its advice./
> Thank you,
> Robin
>
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Burr, Becky wrote:
>
>>
>> J. Beckwith Burr
>> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / 
>> becky.burr at neustar.biz <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / 
>> www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz>
>> <7-21 Mission and Core Values 
>> V2.docx>_______________________________________________
>> WP2 mailing list
>> WP2 at icann.org <mailto:WP2 at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP2 mailing list
> WP2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2

-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150722/9009166c/attachment-0001.html>