[WP2] slightly revised mission, commitments, core values for discussion later today

Wed Jul 22 16:26:25 UTC 2015

Thanks Becky,

I remember some pushback from the right side of the room on the 
jurisdiction but am not sure who. Someone reminded me privately of this 
part of the Tunis agenda, which specifically does not mention this : 
« Policy authority for Internet-related public policy issues is the 
sovereign right of States. They have rights and responsibilities for 
international Internet-related public policy issues. » (para 35 I think).

But as I said, my main concern so far is that I am unable to locate our 
own rationale for that proposal. We were also challenged about not 
providing the rationale for our core value changes. I'd like to help 
bridging this gap.

So if someone could expand about why they feel so strongly about it ?

Mathieu

Le 22/07/2015 18:12, Burr, Becky a écrit :
> The suggestion for using ATRT language is a good one.
>
> I don’t remember pushback on the "within their respective 
> jurisdictions" language in Paris – and I would have because several 
> members of WP2 feel very strongly about this point.
>
> J. Beckwith Burr
>
> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>
> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / 
> becky.burr at neustar.biz <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz
>
>
> From: Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr 
> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>
> Reply-To: "Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr <mailto:Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr>" 
> <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr <mailto:Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr>>
> Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 6:43 AM
> To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at neustar.biz 
> <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz>>, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org 
> <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>
> Cc: "wp2 at icann.org <mailto:wp2 at icann.org>" <wp2 at icann.org 
> <mailto:wp2 at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [WP2] slightly revised mission, commitments, core values 
> for discussion later today
>
> Dear WP2 colleagues,
>
> I want to thank all of you for trying very hard to find agreement on 
> all these topics. I appreciate how everyone is keeping an open mind.
>
> I may have missed this in the discussions but what is the rationale 
> for inserting the words "within their respective jurisdictions" in 
> Core Value 7 (ex-11). I remember we had some pushback on this in Paris.
>
>> While remaining rooted in the [private sector], including business 
>> stakeholders, civil society, the technical community, and academia, 
>> recognizing that governments and public authorities are responsible 
>> for public policy_within their respective jurisdictions_and duly 
>> taking into account the public policy advice of governments and 
>> public authorities 
>
> The proposed addition in Article XI  of the sentence below is also 
> attracting some pushback.
>> or where the Advisory Committee has not explained the specific 
>> reason(s) for its advice.
> My personal view is that it may not be most appropriate to have this 
> criteria in the same sentence and at the same level as "not exceeding 
> the Mission".
>
> I also wonder whether we could find ATRT agreed language on the 
> provision of rationales in support of advice. It seemed to me that 
> these reviews had contributed to significant improvements in that 
> regard and the use of "agreed language" often helps when time is short.
>
> Best,
>
> Le 21/07/2015 20:43, Burr, Becky a écrit :
>> Whoops, apologies – will fix that in the discussion
>>
>> J. Beckwith Burr
>>
>> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>>
>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>>
>> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / 
>> becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
>>
>>
>> From: Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 2:36 PM
>> To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at neustar.biz>
>> Cc: "wp2 at icann.org" <wp2 at icann.org <mailto:wp2 at icann.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [WP2] slightly revised mission, commitments, core values 
>> for discussion later today
>>
>> Looks good - except it is missing the critical word of "not".  So it 
>> should read:
>>
>> /[...] ICANN shall have no authority to act or refrain from acting in 
>> response to inputadvice from an Advisory Committee where such advice 
>> would require ICANN to exceed its Mission or violate these Bylaws or 
>> where the Advisory Committee has not explained the specific reason(s) 
>> for its advice./
>> Thank you,
>> Robin
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Burr, Becky wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> J. Beckwith Burr
>>> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>>> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / 
>>> becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz>
>>> <7-21 Mission and Core Values 
>>> V2.docx>_______________________________________________
>>> WP2 mailing list
>>> WP2 at icann.org <mailto:WP2 at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2 
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_wp2&d=AwMD-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=0YxHNC-x-sRZHXkgEdhPwR1sJq8xsrcTlYDKvCbZ5bE&s=h0LK7Kd1BiEj2pKkN2qhUfxX-nVupNaB4WFXxhnaGBw&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WP2 mailing list
>> WP2 at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>
> -- 
> *****************************
> Mathieu WEILL
> AFNIC - directeur général
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
> *****************************

-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150722/54a8518f/attachment-0001.html>