[WP2] IRP Checklist

[McAuley, David]

Hi Becky,

Do you have a preference for how we tackle this?

I wonder if tracked changes from many folks doesn't get very confusing, and I imagine very hard for you to manage.

Given the succinct list of issues for closure would it make sense to simply take them on one-by-one Monday (especially since they are largely yes/no questions) and if anyone is so inclined they might mail their thinking on the issues beforehand to help move things along.

It's just a suggestion in a process that may have no easy way of untangling. I expect you and others on list have better sense for how we can manage this best.

David McAuley

From: wp2-bounces at icann.org [mailto:wp2-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Burr, Becky
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:26 AM
To: WP2 at ICANN.org
Subject: [WP2] IRP Checklist
Importance: High

I'm attaching the current doc, in which I have tried to incorporate all input.  We need to reach closure on the following questions:


  1.  Overflow panelists - yes or no
  2.  Single panelist decisions - yes or no
  3.  Standard for appeal to full panel - "clear error of judgment or application of an incorrect legal standard" - is this the right standard
  4.  Community override of bone-headed decisions - yes or no
  5.  Length of term
  6.  Term renewal - yes or no
  7.  Exhaustion requirement - yes, no, "where applicable" (not sure I know how to implement third option)

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150724/e8562e95/attachment.html>