[WP2] IRP provider appointment Was: updated documents from this morning

Burr, Becky Becky.Burr at neustar.biz
Wed Jul 29 16:39:06 UTC 2015


Other thoughts folks?


J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz






On 7/29/15, 12:37 PM, "Robin Gross" <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

>I think it would be a mistake for the appointment process not to be
>conducted jointly by the parties entering into it.  For one party (ICANN)
>to be able to conduct the process creates too great of an incentive for
>that process to favor the party who conducts it.  In order to remove the
>incentive for bias, the appointment process should be conducted jointly
>by ICANN and the community.
>
>Thanks,
>Robin
>
>On Jul 29, 2015, at 3:25 AM, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
>
>> Becky,
>> 
>> These papers looks very good, and shows how much we have achieved. We
>> seem to be just about done, so congratulations.
>> 
>> I can find on the paper just one note of disagreement still being
>> recorded, relating to the appointment of the IRP Provider.
>> 
>> * Greg had proposed that the appointment process be conducted by ICANN
>> and the community jointly.
>> 
>> * I had said I thought that this was likely to be unworkable, and that
>> it would be sufficient to have ICANN consult the community on the terms
>> of the tender process, but selection itself should be by ICANN.
>> 
>> Where did we get to on this? I remember a back-and-forth between me and
>> Greg on this list, but don't remember it being discussed by the group.
>> 
>> -> If it hasn't been decided by WP2 collectively, may I ask that you
>> test the group's opinion as to whether they prefer my approach or
>>Greg's?
>> 
>> -> If it has been decided and I just missed it, and the collective view
>> was to prefer Greg's proposal, you may remove the footnote noting my
>> disagreement: it is not my view that this is such a serious issue that I
>> would want to preserve my objection as a minority statement to go into
>> the Final Report for Public Comment.
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> 
>> Malcolm.
>> 
>> -- 
>>            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>>   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
>> London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>> 
>>                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
>>           21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
>> 
>>         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>>       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> WP2 mailing list
>> WP2 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>> 
>



More information about the WP2 mailing list