<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif; font-size: 12px"><div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" />
<div><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><b>From</b>: "Malcolm Hutty" <malcolm@linx.net><br />
<b>Sent</b>: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:00 PM<br />
<b>To</b>: "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com><br />
<b>Cc</b>: "WP2@icann.org" <WP2@icann.org><br />
<b>Subject</b>: Re: [WP2] current state of IRP checklist plus sample bylaws language and the comment summary</span>
<div> </div>
<div>Hi Malcolm,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
> On 26 Jul 2015, at 19:16, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
> The issue of what happens to the IRP time period if the potential Complainant requests a CEP is handled in the CEP rules and procedures<br />
<br />
Quite how CEP procedures override the Bylaws escapes me...<br />
_______________________________________________</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The CEP is actually considered part of the Bylaws, referenced in section 3(14), Personally I'd like to kill it off but any such possibility will apparently have to wait until work stream 2...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ed</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br />
WP2 mailing list<br />
WP2@icann.org<br />
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2<br />
</div>
</div></span>