[Wp3] Fwd: SO/AC ACCT

[Mathieu Weill]

Dear colleagues,

I apologize for not being able to join the call later today. As you're 
aware the SO/AC accountability and diversity discussions are on an ever 
growing trend in terms of intensity within the group since the Board 
(and other stakeholders) has clarified that many of its concerns were 
rooted in these issues.

As a contribution to the work of this group, in addition to the 
excellent staff summaries, I share below some personal notes I took 
during the LA meeting, based on the public comments I read.

I hope this is helpful.

Best
Mathieu


-------- Message transféré --------

-------------------

Overall community power discussions have led to concerns regarding the
accountability of SOs and ACs. This is the core of many of the issues
we've been discussing.
In this regard, it's worth noting that the following ideas have been
raised in the public comment.  :
1) there are existing mechanisms in the SO/ACs
2) CCWG 2nd report recommends that regular SO and AC reviews scope is
extended to include accountability (external studies, under Board
supervision). ACCT is to those who participate + those who they should
represent.
3) Suggestions related to SO/AC accountability received in PC2
      - extend IRP scope to include challenge of regularity of Single
Member decisions (due process)
      - Set up a conflict of interest Inspector office to investigate /
assess
      - others ?
4) suggestion from the chat
      - Use same removal process for councillors in SO/ACs.



-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************